Issue #34
11 November 1996
Back Issues

Please visit the following sites
Remember, it's your click-throughs that pay for Aardvark's production.



Ripped Off?




Mansion For Sale at Takatu

E.Central Ltd


Flexible Solutions


Trader Series

Elite Fitness


Auckland Honda


iProLink WELLINGTON and CHRISTCHURCH access now available!

Click here

NZ's largest internet shopping site, online soon!

Other good Reads:

Learn HTML:

If you've got a site that you think is "worth a look", drop me an email and if I think you're right, I'll mention it here.


  • Sites that don't link to Aardvark
  • Broken password changing systems

If you like this page, tell your friends, relatives, associates and mother. They'll love you for it!

Surprise someone today!

A weekly E-zine about the NZ internet industry

Edition #34

Well what can you say? If content is king then the launch of NBR's web site must surely herald the arrival of of a new contender for the crown.

My initial imressions of this site were perhaps affected by my visit to the new ClearNet site just minutes before. By comparison, NBR's site is visually stark, some might say unattractive, although if feedback from Aardvark readers is anything to go by, there is a large camp of Net users who think that the look is "just right".

NBR's site is one of the few on the NZ Web that can get away with charging a subscription for access to some of its services. Typically the mindset of the average Net user has been that "if it's on the Web then it should be free" - but that's not NBR's market. They're out to provide their existing print version readers with more convenient access to the information they're already used to paying for. Reportedly, NBR are quite happy with the level of subscriptions already received and as the headline for this story suggests, the site may be just the reason many business-people need to make the move to the Net.

However... there is a lot for free at NBR and its biggest asset is the fact that the content changes continuously. Let's face it, one of the things which makes TV such an effective medium and so popular with the masses is that it's a constant flow of changing content - in fact just look at how we tend to "turn off" when faced with endless repeats during the "Summer Season". There are a lot of web sites out there which create an initial stir of excitement - but then fade into virtual obscurity simply because they're never updated regularly.

Something not immediately apparent is that behind the scenes, NBR's site works a little differently to most others. It's not just a collection of web pages stored on a server. With constantly changing content such as news and financial information, this would be far to labour-intensive to maintain economically. Instead, the heart of the NBR site is a large database of constantly updated information from which web pages are created "on the fly". This has pro's and con's. On Friday when the site launched, many people noticed that things ran very slowly - possibly due to bandwidth limitations - but equally possibly due to the huge loads that this type of configuration puts on the server - since it has to query the database and create a new web page each time a user clicks on a link.

The site is new, just a few days old, so perhaps some of the flaws and design errors can be forgiven. I found several places where the database queries were failing and instead of getting a web page containing the information I was expecting - I got a diagnostic page from the database engine which was complaining about some type of configuration error. Users should never have to see this type of techno-babble. It should be replaced with a more "user-friendly" error message that doesn't cause the less computer-literate amongst us to break into a cold sweat. I also noticed that on a couple of occasions, the search function returned links which simply didn't work. There are still some planned services which appear to be "under construction" and one occasionally gets the impression that there remains a bit of tidying up to do.

Regardless of any minor teething problems, one thing's for sure, The NBR site has redefined "content" on the Internet in New Zealand and set a benchmark by which all new players will be measured.

What's bad:

  • US surveys show that 80% of net users don't like scrolling banners on the status lines of their browsers. This space has a very specific purpose and should not be commandered by a web-site - there are other more sensible ways to add scrolling advertising banners.
  • The news pages don't have a "headline-index" at the top. This forces users to wade through 40Kbytes of text just to see what the last headline on the page is.
  • The database engine sometimes produces bad results or fails.
What's good:
  • Content that's updated regularly!
  • Some really useful information and services
  • It brings further endorsement of the Net as a business tool
  • Is your name in NBR today (perfect for megalomaniacs).

So, how does it rate on the Aardvark scale?
Content: 8/10, extra points for the fact that content is udpated almost continuously.
Visuals: 5/10, seems you either love it or hate it so half-marks sounds fair.
Ease of Navigation: 6/10, frames are used to help navigation although access some information requires up to four clicks from the front-page.

The second of the "biggies" launched last week was ClearNet, the ISP service from our second biggest Telco.

If there's one thing that everyone agrees on, it's that this site is just simply the most visually outstanding site on the Web in NZ. You'll need to make sure you've got Netscape 3.0 or MSIE 3.0 to fully appreciate this site but it is an almost perfect balance of text and graphics.

Even the front-page is different and very contemporary with an almost total absence of straight lines and a very clean "white" image.

The various categories on the site are similarly clean and while the pages are quite "busy", there is still more than enough white space to avoid a cluttered look. Would-be web-page authors will probably spend hours pawing over the code behind these pages and picking up a wealth of handy little "tips" and "tricks". Full marks to the web designers behind this site who - I'm sure -can't be the same people that designed the contrastingly awful Clear Corporate site at

Visually, Clear's Corporate site is, in a word - horrible! In stark contrast to their ISP site, this is a dark, dingy place with little appeal to it. On Sunday when I tried to connect it was down - probably suffering from terminal depression due to all the black backgrounds :-)

But back to the ISP site.... As was the case with Telecom's Xtra site when it was launched, this is mainly a launch-pad full of links but with very little local content. Such sites can be fun places to visit, but there are simply thousands of "link-launchpads" all over the web so Clear are going to have to come up with some regularly updated local content to keep anyone other than their own subscribers from coming back regularly - the novelty of a "great look" can only last so long.

If you're a ClearNet subscriber you can customise your homepage so that it contains only the type of information you're interested in - plus your own user-defined hot-links. This is a nice touch and something which is being adopted by quite a number of sites on the Web.

I have to admit that even after a concerted effort - I couldn't find any rough edges to this site - it's polished!

What's bad:

  • Launch-pad link-sites often suffer from stagnation and the only site-specific content at present seems to be a handful of news stories.
  • Home-page customisation is only available to ClearNet subscribers - but that's not so unreasonable.
  • There could have been more emphasis on NZ links.
  • No link to Aardvark! (please write to them and complain :-)
What's good:
  • It looks so damned good!
  • Nice little touches of Java
  • Customisable home-page (for subscribers)

So, how does it rate on the Aardvark scale?
Content: 5/10, This may drop if the site stagnates.
Visuals: 10/10, Have YOU seen anything better?
Ease of Navigation: 7/10, Most everything is intuitive and within a couple of clicks - even without the use of frames.

Now imagine what would happen if you had the visuals of the ClearNet site combined with the content of NBR's! That would be one killer location!

Several Aardvark readers sent me copies of mail-headers that had confused Xtra's mailservers. They were all returned with the advice that the "maximum number of hops" had been exceeded. In essence this means that someone had screwed up Xtra's mailserver configuration and people's email was going around in circles.

Okay... I've given Xtra enough grief for a while. It will be very interesting to see how ISPANZ and the general internet community respond to ClearNet's arrival into the marketplace. Maybe Xtra will be given some respite from being the big fish in NZ's little-pond.

ClearNet has been very smart in pricing their 0800 service at a dollar an hour more than Xtras. Obviously they don't wish to get embroiled in the current Commerce Commission investigation into alleged predatory pricing. I expect that their price-positioning will actually strengthen the ISPANZ/Voyager case.

Given this pricing structure, it doesn't appear that Clear are in a hurry to ramp up their subscriber numbers or capture a huge chunk of the market in the same way that Xtra has done since its launch. This can only be good news for those who subscribe to ClearNet since one hopes that this will provide plenty of time to ensure that the hardware, software and security systems are up to scratch before they're stressed too hard.

So far Voyager and Xtra have been regularly publishing their growing subscriber numbers as a way of proving their success both to the market and, in the case of Xtra, potential advertisers.

Now that ClearNet is here I think it's time that some rules and definitions are spelt out more clearly so as to ensure that we're dealing with facts and not PR.

How are the big players going to define a "subscriber" when there's no minimum monthly commitment? Voyager include any of their users who has logged in during the past 90 days - what to Xtra and Clear plan to use as a frame of reference?

What point is there in advertising "We have xx,000 customers" when everyone knows full well that a (perhaps large) percentage of those customers are also users of a competing service provider? With no minimum monthly commitment there's no harm in subscribing to all the ISPs - just in case one of them has a special offer (such as Voyager's recent "Free Monday") or in case you need to urgently send email while your usual provider's system is down. One thing's for sure, adding up the claimed subscriber-base of each of the ISPs will NOT give you the total number of Net-users in NZ.

Those who have scrutinised the ClearNet and Xtra sites will notice that although there are links to @IDG, Infotech, Bits & Bytes and other local publications - there's no link to Aardvark. Given that Aardvark is considered by some to be one of the more widely read and influential sites in the industry - and knowing full well that it is read religiously by the management and staff of these organisations - I ask, why is it not included in the relevant list of similar sites? A little TOO HOT perhaps?

Anyone mentioned by Aardvark who feels that they have been misrepresented or who wish a "right of reply" are invited to send email to me at and the contents of that email will be printed verbatim for all to read.

Nothing this week


Everyone will remember the big fuss that occured a while back over Xtra's security woes. Around ten thousand new passwords were emailed out to subscribers and everyone was advised to change their passwords regularly as a sensible security precaution.

Well... let's give it a go!

Oh dear... unless they've fixed it by the time you read this you'll see what I mean.

So You Don't Forget!
Click here if you want an email each time a new issue of Aardvark is published.

Remind Me

CONFIDENTIALITY: Note that your email address will be kept totally confidential and not released to any third parties for any reason. Aardvark values the patronage of its readers and won't be compromising that patronage for the sake of a quick buck! (besides which it's probably illegal under the privacy act :-)

Feel free to drop me a line if you have any comments on this publication or interesting news you think might appeal to Aardvark readers.. I'm always keen to receive criticism (constructive or otherwise).

Advertise on Aardvark!

The entire contents of this publication are copyright 1996 to Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved. Don't copy it without my permission - just ask, I'm unlikely to refuse any reasonable request.

The Software Experience

Back to Aardvark Daily...