New Zealand's Leading Daily Net-News Online Publication |
Net-Industry NEWS! |
|
|
Publishing Internet News and Commentary since 1995
.
| ||
| ||
|
Dateline: 13 January 2000 Early Edition Read The Previous Edition
Editorial
The rationale behind this move was that a small percentage of the users were
creating a disproportional level of load on the service -- to the extent
that other users were adversely affected.
Well IHUG have now made a similar move in respect to their Diamond Account
flat rate dial-up Net access plan.
Until this week, IHUG had promoted the plan as "Unlimited Internet" -- which
it was. The only practical restriction being that anyone online for more than
3 hours in a stretch during peak times would get disconnected -- but would
then be able dial back in if they wanted.
According to IHUG, the same situation as forced the SatNet changes has finally
caught up with their Diamond Accounts -- and the few people who spend more than
350 hours per month online are having an impact which is disproportionately high.
To address the problem, IHUG says that anyone staying online for more than 350
hours per month -- about 12 hours per day, will no longer qualify for a flat-rate
Diamond account and will instead be shifted to a $199/month permanent-connect
account.
So... do those who have protested very loudly have a point when they claim that
this is unfair and unreasonable?
If you're one of the 99% of users who doesn't fit the "power user"
description then I guess you'll be happy with IHUG's decision because it means
you'll find it easier to get online when you want and, once you do, things
could even run a little faster.
Opponents of the move have claimed that this is just another way for IHUG
to boost their profits and cut costs -- and you know -- they're probably dead
right.
But isn't that the whole idea of running a business?
Don't IHUG have a right to expect a reasonable return on their investment?
Do XTRA, ClearNet, or indeed any other NZ ISPs offer a $40/month dial-up
account that has absolutely no restrictions on the amount of time you spend
online?
Seems to me that they all have some kind of limitation so as to ensure that
a few power-users don't unnecessarily raise the price of Net access for everyone
else.
I gather that IHUG have amended their claims for the Diamond Account and
no longer claim it offers "endless Internet" and I don't think we can hit them
too hard for simply responding to the need to maintain reasonable profit
margins and ensure that the majority of users get a fair deal.
I guess the bottom line is that if you're a power-user who's unhappy with
IHUG's changes then you can always vote with your wallet -- unfortunately
I think you may find it difficult to locate another ISP that's prepared to
offer you anything better.
A few users may have had their noses put out of joint by IHUG's decision -- but
perhaps they should just be thankful that they had such a deal for so long and
appreciate the fact that no ISP can be expected to operate as a charity.
Disclosure:
I also pay significantly more than $199 per month for a 24/7 connection to the
Net!
|
|
Aardvark Daily is a publication of, and is copyright to, Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved
|