New Zealand's Leading Daily Net-News Online Publication |
Net-Industry NEWS! |
|
|
Publishing Internet News and Commentary since 1995
.
| ||
| ||
|
Dateline: 20 January 2000 Early Edition Read The Previous Edition
Editorial
The chances are that XTRA's front page would win -- but then again -- they
do have the advantage of being an ISP and having the largest user-base
of anyone in the business. By configuring their startup disk and customised
browser so that
www.xtra.co.nz
becomes the default (and in many causes
unalterable) starting point for its customers each time they log on, XTRA
can guarantee that its front page will be thrashed all day long.
However, being the most often loaded does not, in my book, mean a site
is necessarily the most "popular." To me, popularity implies a
choice freely made -- which again leads me
to ask -- what is NZ's most popular website?
I suspect that high on the list are "utility" sites such as
www.yellowpages.co.nz,
www.whitepages.co.nz,
along with the family of TVNZ
operated websites and maybe
www.trade-exchange.co.nz.
Sam, over at
www.trademe.co.nz
has told me of his very respectable levels of
traffic -- but therein lies another problem... does popular just mean
busy or does it mean appealing to a large number of people?
Which is more popular... a site that gets the same people coming back several
times a day or a site that gets a larger number of users visiting less
frequently?
Aardvark's single daily page is loaded around 60,000 times a month -- but it's
generally the same 2,000-3,000 people who come back five days a week
creating this number. Is Aardvark more popular or less popular therefore than
a site which publishes once a month but gets 50,000 individual visitors during that same
period?
And, ultimately, why is it important to know which sites are most popular?
The usual answer is that it's important information for advertisers. They
tell me that everyone wants to advertise on the most popular sites. But,
given that most Web-based advertising is charged for on a "per view" basis --
one must ask why?
If an advertiser is paying 10 cents everytime someone sees their advertisement,
what difference does it make whether their $1,000 worth of advertising banners
appears on a site that has 1,000 visitors a day or one that has 10,000? Okay,
in the first case their ad-budget will last 10 days, in the second it will
be consumed within 24-hours -- but does it make the message any more or less
effective?
Quite honestly, I think this "most popular" thing is all about prestige and
image. Of course everyone wants to be the most popular (or at least more
popular than their competition).
Unfortunately none of this solves the problems of how to define and measure
popularity. Does anyone have any answers? -- more importantly, does it really
matter?
Why don't you tell me?
|
|
Aardvark Daily is a publication of, and is copyright to, Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved
|