Reader Comments on Aardvark Daily 7 Dec 2000
From: andrew mccallum For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Internet dropoff This is simply a sign of maturing use and reality catching up with hype. There is no great need in daily life to spend hours online. Familiarity means people use the Net more efficiently. As to ex-users, it comes down to whether the Internet adds real value to people's lives. Chatting online leaves me cold. Newsgroups are cool, but my use of them is very specific. The web I use as an information source, not as a place of entertainment. Email of course is the most useful of all. E-tailing was always only going to be yet another channel that only some people would use, and then only for some very specific things. From: Henk Klos For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Make that "Bill Of Jokes" In response to: this comment In a silly civil case where a large corporation took me to court to prevent me from using a particular colour on my website the following took place. The plaintiff asked the judge for me to be called in the witness box to answer some questions. The judge approved this request and I was summoned in the witness box. (Here goes your right “not to be compelled to be a witness or to confess guilt”, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Section 25d). Once in the box, the plaintiff asked me a question I did not want to answer because I felt it would be incriminating to myself and another person (who had nothing to do with the case). I decided not to answer this question and told the plaintiff so. The plaintiff then asked the judge to force me to answer the question so this time the judge asked me "are you refusing to answer the question?". I said yes whereupon the judge said, "not in my courtroom you ain't" and ordered me to answer the question or be put in jail until I was willing to answer the question. (And there goes your right not to incriminate yourself). Bill of Rights? Don’t make me laugh. From: Paul Garner For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Internet vs CB radio The internet won't go the way of CB radio because the internet is more than just IRC chat. There's too many companies with too much money invested (and a handful maybe even making some money!) to let it fall by the wayside. Whereas I would guess that there were few commercial interests in CB radio... on the contrary, telecoms would have had an interest in shutting it down - the same companies that are betting their futures on the Internet.Now Have Your Say
Home | Today's Headlines | Contact | New Sites | Job Centre | Investment Centre