Reader Comments on Aardvark Daily 21 February 2002
Note: the comments below are the unabridged
submissions of readers and do
not necessarily reflect the opinions of the publisher.
From: Nik For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Responding to spam IT savvy people should know not to respond to spam or you just end up getting more. So its no real shock to see that few people complained, as most spam has a forged return address of some sort. I just delete that sort of spam without running the web- bugs. If the spammers think your address is inactive, eventually they might give up! From: Steve Peacocke For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Shell Shocked The results reported from the spamming company confirms what I would expect. Despite their best (not good enough) efforts to target people involved in specific industries, most of their emails did not reach a live human - ie: playing darts blind-folded without first checking if the pub, let alone the dart-board, is still where it was some years ago. Of those that reached a human, all but the least intelligent simply pressed delete on the several spam emails that arrived in their in-box for that hour. We, as longer term internet users (ie; long enough to have an email go onto someone's list), have gotten so shell- shocked with an ever increasing number of spam emails that we have simply given up. It's like trying to get government to look at facts rather than political points, It just does no good. If you reply with anger, all you'll get for your trouble is to be added to a premium "Live User" list and receive more spam. If you contact Xtra or some others, all you'll get is silence. There will always be people who send on chain letters; send those 500K moving pictures; email everyone they know telling them to delete Kernel.exe because it's a virus; or buy goods from a spammer. What we've got to do is find a way to detect those people at birth, and throttle them. From: paul warner For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Spamming I suspect that the reason that more people did not kick up a fuss is that there is a golden rule. Don't respond to the unsubscribe link . It just tells them that it is a valid email address and you'll get lots more. From: Sam Richardson For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Talking of Spam I recieved in my inbox yesterday, mail from fullpromote.com asking me if I would like to promote my website geekpages.co.nz. Well, first of all, I don't actually own the site, and second of all, it must be somewhat easy to get someones contact details via the DNS records about the site, so why then, was the mail targetted at me? Never-the-less, we have found the next prank call that we are going to make. From: Peter George For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Spamming I think a major reason why so few would "kick up a fuss" is it takes too long to do this with each spam we all receive, I have wanted to do something a number of times but have decided that delete and ignore is the best use of my time. Perhaps this is ok in the short term but it possibly may be to our ongoing detriment. What is not determined from what you have said is that while 60% approximately "read" but did not buy, it is unknown what effect these people will have on business if disgruntled. How many of them are prospective customers who now are less likely to deal with a spamming company? This needs to be weighed against the 0.1% success rate. From: Simon For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Reading of Spam 66% of people read spam? I don't quite think so. I would imagine alot of the people in that percentage were caught by Microsoft Outlooks email preview. I personally run Microsoft outlook express at home, and lets face it with Microsoft pushing IE and Outlook on you, who doesn't? The problem is here to delete the spam I have to read it, but I don't actually read the spam! I would imagine that the real percentage is quite a lot lower than 66% From: Tom V For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Please tell me the name of the company So I can make sure that I never purchase any product off them and advise anyone else I know to also not do so. The sooner we drive wankers like that out of business the better. I always wanted to meet a spammer. I can truthfully say that they're about the only group of people I have an almost uncontrollable urge to punch in the face. Aardvark Responds: They say there's no such thing as bad publicity -- so I made the decision not to name the company involved. As far as I'm concerned they're not getting any free promotion through this site.Hit Reload For Latest Comments
Now Have Your Say
Home | Today's Headlines | Contact | New Sites | Job Centre | Investment Centre