Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact|
This seems to be an issue that simply won't go away -- what's legal and what's
not when it comes to the Net and digital media?
Kiwi websurfers and music-lovers could be forgiven for being very, very confused
about what will get them into trouble and what won't.
Last week I tried to clarify the situation in respect to copyright law -- but
the Net is a global medium and we're constantly being bombarded by news
reports from the USA and Europe where different laws apply. It's no wonder
therefore, that many people are still not sure where the legal line sits.
And then there's the seemingly larger issue of exactly what parts of the law
are likely to be enforced.
I think it's fair to say that for a law to be fair, it should be enforced
with some consistency -- but that's perhaps the weakest aspect of our
legal system's attitude to all things Internet.
Take the recent name-suppression order relating to an attempted kidnapping
As I mentioned last week -- the name of the intended victim was suppressed
by the courts but was published on an overseas news site virtually the
Although I didn't link to that story, several other locals did -- and one
even named the individual concerned in a usenet newsgroup.
That newsgroup message was held on numerous news-servers right here on NZ
soil and effectively published to thousands of eager NZ Net users.
Yes, that's right, XTRA (and others) were effectively publishing this
suppressed information directly from one of their servers. It wasn't
transparently imported from some overseas site -- it was created locally and
uploaded directly to an XTRA server, where it remained for some time.
Were those ISPs whose news-servers carried the messages which breached the
court suppression order legally liable?
Well a very
very similar incident
in the UK might indicate that there's good reason to assume they might be.
The fact that neither the ISPs, nor the individuals who posted the information
breaching the order have even been warned against their actions sends a clear
message to others that it's okay to do this.
I'm not going to voice any kind of opinion as to whether this is a good thing
or not -- except to reiterate that if the powers that be expect laws to be
obeyed then they must be prepared to enforce them in a consistent manner.
Which is why I find this story
If Jane Clifton is prosecuted for breaching the court suppression order then
it would make a mockery of the claim that we have a justice system in this
The story she wrote was not published in New Zealand but Clifton appears to
be in the gun. However, several other NZers who did publish the same information
on a number of local sites seem to have done so with impunity.
Perhaps this is just another example of how NZ seems to be turning into a
country where there are two standards by which the laws are applied.
Or maybe it's just that the courts need to set a precedent over this whole
issue of court-ordered suppression and the Internet and Clifton would be
a nice high-profile target whose castigation would produce maximum effect.
Unfortunately, I suspect that the case involving Jane Clifton is not a
representative one. The real test needs to be whether linking to such
information is legal or not.
Given that the Net now constitutes such a significant aspect of our business and
recreational activities -- it's probably time for government to come out with
a simple, easily understood guide to the law and new technology.
Surely, if such a plain English guide were available, people would be far less
likely to break the law through ignorance and this would make those laws far
It could also help dispel the FUD currently being spread by the likes of
the recording industry whose claims that burning CDs constitutes "theft" are
clearly without any substance in law.
If such a resource were readily available online, I expect that most
sensible ISPs would certainly link to it as part of their
introductory package for new Net users. Hey -- that'd produce a lot of free
advertising for whoever put in the time and effort to build such a resource
Have your say.
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it