Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Is the Net killing innovation?

23 February 2018

I had to laugh when I was scanning the news wires today.

Aardvark readers will doubtless recall that on Wednesday (the 21st) I published a column titled "Peak Smartphone" in which I asked whether people might stop upgrading their phones on such a regular basis because we'd already achieved a perfectly good level of power, performance and convenience with the ones we have.

Well knock me down with a feather but this morning I spotted this story (dated today which is 22nd Feb UK-time) running in The Telegraph's technology section.

Is the Telegraph so desperate for story ideas that they're now reading Aardvark?

No, of course not. What this demonstrates is several things:

Firstly, the old adage that "great minds think alike" is a true one.

Secondly, there really isn't too much to write about these days, when it comes to "technology".

I do miss the fire and the passion, the innovation and the pace of development that occurred in the computer and allied industries back in the 1980s. Today's industry is slow and tedious by comparison.

Back in the 1980s, microcomputers were "new" and exciting. Every day bought about new designs, new products, new concepts, new ideas and exciting new breakthroughs.

What was even more astonishing about this period was that all this took place without a ubiquitous internet to help people share their ideas and hard work. Or maybe that was *why* the 1980s was such an exciting period -- because so many people were working in virtual isolation that new ideas abounded.

How ironic that maybe it's the existence of the Net which is responsible for a general slowing of the pace of development.

Could it be that back in those halcyon days of the '80s, we tried stuff because we didn't know that someone else may have already tried it and failed. We didn't allow the failure of others to put us off investigating ideas and concepts that ultimately became new pieces of technology or new products.

Today, it's ridiculously easy to jump online to research the viability of an idea and find out who (if anyone) has already given it a go. How easy is it to be put off by finding a series of instances where others have attempted to do the same as you're planning to do -- but failed? If you know that other, possibly better funded and more highly knowledgeable people have failed to get an idea to work then you're far less likely to give it a go yourself.

Not so 35 years ago.

Back then, most information was disseminated by print media. Byte magazine, Dr Dobbs Journal and a small stack of influential magazines were the way you found out what others were doing and that meant we all pretty much operated in isolation.

Attending an industry trade fair would also give you a clue as to what had been successful but it didn't document the failures that, these days, might be causing many good ideas to be set-aside due to the inadequacies of attempts made by others.

It's also *much* harder to keep a secret today.

Just look at how often the latest iPhone or Galaxy is "leaked" to the world via social media and remember how easy it is for a single "leak" to propagate round the world in a matter of minutes thanks to the effectiveness of the Net and the many services that run on it.

So is the proliferation of instant, virtually-free global communication actually helping or harming innovation in the tech sector?

Surely we're not seeing a noticeable downturn in "cool new stuff" simply because we've hit some kind of technology ceiling -- so what's the explanation for the blandness of today's tech landscape?

Or is this simply a perception problem on my part?

Is it that, because I am no longer living on the bleeding edge, I'm not seeing the stuff that used to get me all hyped up and excited?

You tell me!

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Oh the irony
YouTube has made a lot of noise about enforcing its community standards of late...

The end of live streaming?
The events of last Friday continue to have deep repercussions on the shape and form that the internet may take from this point forwards...

More internet restrictions
It really does look as if the internet is dying -- from the perspective of being an open, free and somewhat anonymous method of accessing and disseminating information...

The future looks bleak
Today's column was going to be about the tragedy of the Christchurch mosque attacks which happened on Friday of last week...

No longer plane simple
Just about every country in the developed world has now grounded the Boeing 737 Max 8 aircraft, after two crashes that have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people...

When the sun shines
We all know where clouds live... in the sky...

Actions speak louder than words
I've written a few columns about the (apparent) decline in geekiness and the sad way people seem to be uninterested in the technology that powers the world around us...

A black-box society?
A few days ago I made a video (as you do) about how there seems to be a lack of interest in "making stuff" these days...

Tightening the screws?
The UK is pulling out of the EU in a move that has been called "Brexit"...

Treating symptoms not causes
Governments like to treat symptoms rather than causes...

Money-grab delayed
If you read yesterday's column, you may be interested in what has happened subsequently...