Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 24th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2018 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

On the edge of oblivion?

12 April 2018

As I type this, the world stands on the edge of oblivion, teetering precariously on the ledge at the top of a deep abyss.

Okay, I over-dramatise, but just a little.

I'm talking about the conflict in Syria, where US President Donald Trump has just come out warning Russia that they can expect a barrage of missiles to rain down on their Syrian presence in response to alleged gas attacks against civilian targets.

In reply, Russia has said it will shoot down the missiles and attack any craft from which they are launched.

Sounds like a powder-keg set to explode doesn't it?

Yet somehow, I doubt we'll see either side honour its threats.

Why not? Surely not to follow-through on such bold and clear threats would be seen as a back-down by either side.

Well I'm picking that neither the USA nor Russia can afford to really display the full capabilities (or lack thereof) of their offensive and defensive capabilities.

One of the biggest aids to maintaining peace between the superpowers right now is a mutual doubt over the military capabilities of the other.

Russia claims to have super-weapons that can shoot down any incoming missiles and to have missiles of its own that can evade US defenses with ease.

The USA claims to have superiority in the area of airborne weapons systems which would allow it to attack any target it wants with unstoppable might.

The perception may be significantly different to the reality and I doubt that either side would want to risk having their perceived "might" destroyed by a demonstration which could well prove that these claims are more hype than reality.

Imagine if Trump launches 100 cruise missiles against Syrian targets -- and none of them get through.

Likewise, imagine if Russia engages the USA in a firefight and gets roundly thrashed.

Neither side can afford to end up with that much egg on their face so they will be incredibly reluctant to put their claims of technological superiority to the test. Far better to retain the aura of invincibility than to demonstrate a weakness or fallibility.

So for this reason, Trump will continue rattling his sabre and Putin will continue goading him to "have a go and see what happens".

Meanwhile, US military defense contractors are probably excited and nervous at the same time. On the one hand, they'd win big if there was a significant engagement in the Middle East -- because missiles and bullets can only be used once so they could expect huge orders for replacements within a relatively short time.

On the other hand however, if their very sophisticated and expensive weapons systems failed to perform as promised and were eclipsed by Russia's equivalents, their future as preferred suppliers to the US government would be placed in jeopardy.

Anyone care to place bets as to what will happen in the next few months?

Will, as I predict, Trump fail to follow-through on his threats and promises -- or at least simply rely on the USA's allies to launch an attack, thus carefully ensuring that the might and reputation of the USA's technology isn't put on the line? Or will Trump attack and Putin hold back from any retaliatory responses for fear that his claims of superweapons will be exposed as nothing more than hype and bluster?

It's really not much different to those playground squabbles we used to engage in when at primary school isn't it? Except that Trump and Putin are playing with billions of dollars of other people's money and real human lives.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Will we be spoilt by choice?
On the day when it was announced that Google has been hit with a $5bn fine for limiting the search choices of android users, I ask the question:...

Two short decades
As I get older, I find myself increasingly looking back at the changes that have taken place during my life (to date)...

What is wrong with Elon Musk?
Everyone knows of Elon Musk...

Are we being LED astray?
LED lights are the future... right?...

Court: Kodi streams OK, caching not
Some time ago, SkyTV took a case to court claiming that preloaded Kodi boxes were illegal and breached copyright...

Proof that politicians are idiots
I've written several columns on this whole issue of the "Amazon Tax" and in each one I have suggested that the government is dreaming if it thinks overseas companies will play ball...

DIY tech projects... still a thing?
At present I'm scoping several tech projects for featuring in my YouTube channels and I'm hoping that the spirit of tech-DIY is still alive and well...

Blurring the line
One advantage of being a bit under the weather is that it has given me time to get more familiar with the new editing and compositing software I'm recently purchased...

A matter of taste
One of the least-mentioned but most annoying aspects of having Parkinson's is that you lose your sense of smell...

Dotcom, a victim of our justice system?
The Court of Appeals has thrown out an attempt by Kim Dotcom to overturn a lower-court decision that he be available for extradition to the USA on charges of copyright infringement, fraud and such...

What did I miss?
Woohoo... I finally got a proper night's sleep! ...