Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Who do you believe?

8 April 2019

I think everyone is well aware of the fiasco that was the rigging of emission tests by the likes of VW and other European diesel car makers a year or two ago.

By using software that recognised when the vehicles were being tested, rather than being driven normally, the onboard systems were able to trick the test-gear into believing that the NO2 emissions of these vehicles were far less than was actually the case in regular use.

When the scam was exposed, all hell broke loose, people went to jail and huge fines were levied.

In Germany itself, large numbers of near-new diesel vehicles were decommissioned and headed for the scrap-heap to be recycled, at an enormous cost to their owners and the vehicle industry.

This was done because of the huge health risks we've been told are associated with NO2 and particulate emissions.

But is this really true?

That seems to be a question that nobody, until now, has really asked.

It seems that everyone, including the media, have been happy to accept the claims that levels of NO2 which exceed 50 micro-grams per cubic metre are injurious to health.

However, this DW documentary that I came across the other day, seems to cast significant doubt on those claims:

If you watch the video, you'll see that the claims in respect to the "toxic" levels of NO2 and particulates appear to be based on bad science. One might even say that certain parties have just plucked them out of their backsides.

DW is a highly respected broadcaster which is not known for "fake news" or deceptive documentaries so this video can't be discounted lightly and it should perhaps be seen as a warning that there are certain groups who will "invent facts" to bolster their own agendas as and when suits them.

I'm no doctor, I'm no environmental scientist -- but it all seems quite credible that the risk from NO2 emissions has been grossly overstated. On the other hand, I have to acknowledge that the German auto industry has taken a real hammering from this whole emissions scandal so there might just as easily be an agenda to try and repair some of that damage by trying to discount the magnitude of the effects these emissions could have on human health.

Ultimately, this is a perfect example of how it has become increasingly difficult to trust or believe *anyone* in an age when corporations have such immense power, the media is more interested in chasing profits than facts, and there are so many sources with different perspectives on the same events.

Perhaps the only up-side is that this stuff will all become irrelevant in the next decade or so as we switch to EVs and the era of nasty, polluting, dino-juice-powered personal transport is relegated to the history books.

What do readers think? Is this DW documentary a revelation or an attempt to simply downplay the seriousness of the problem created by these faked emission tests?

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

FUD, the ultimate marketing tool
Thanks to the wonders of the internet and a copyright-breaching upload to YouTube, last night I watched the BBC Panorama documentary on the drone scare at Gatwick airport which took place last Christmas...

VPNs the boom and the ban
VPNs (Virtual Private Networks) are an important part of the modern internet and it looks as if they are going to become even more essential in the coming months and years...

Let's do this thing!
Last week I wrote about my idea to decentralise the business of user-generated online content...

Another step towards 1984
All journeys start and end with a single step...

Google - what laws?
We all know about Google's "clever" strategies for reducing their tax burden in most countries...

A ban on crypto-mining?
With the boom in crypto-currencies, the world has become acutely aware that your Bitcoin or other unit of exchange can actually be rather expensive to mine, certainly from an energy perspective...

Time for Huawei to emigrate?
Huawei has become one of the largest and most powerful manufacturers of communications technology in the 21st century...

Who do you believe?
I think everyone is well aware of the fiasco that was the rigging of emission tests by the likes of VW and other European diesel car makers a year or two ago...

You can't fix "stupid"
Just a brief column today because I have a pretty hectic schedule ahead of me before the sun sets on this week...

Why should we feel ashamed?
Since it seems that talking about the Christchurch mosque shootings is verboten on just about every social media platform or in the comments section of our news websites I figured there's only one place left for me (and you) to have your say...

Why EVs are essential to NZ's energy future
When the Tesla Roadster first appeared on the market, I was skeptical... very skeptical...