Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Youtube infuriates users

12 November 2021

When I write a column about the idiocy that sometimes drives decision-making at YouTube it does bad things to the daily stats for Aardvark.

It seems that although most people use YouTube, few actually care what is being done to change and shape the service or how its creators are being treated. I can understand that but today I shall risk the wrath of the "TL;DR" effect and inform you of something that has created a real shirt-storm within the YT community.

Perhaps the reaction has been so strong this time because it involves a significant level of dishonesty and deceit on the part of the Google operation.

Read about it and tell me in the comments if you agree or disagree with what they're doing and the way they're going about it.

YouTube is more than a video on demand (VOD) service delivering user-generated content to the masses.

Unlike Netflix, Amazon Prime or Disney+, YouTube allows viewers to engage with the content by leaving comments and/or giving the content they see their approval or disapproval via the thumbs up/down buttons.

It is this interaction that makes YouTube more than just a "read only" medium. The discussions and interactions that follow the upload of a video can be more interesting and important than the video itself. The thumbs up/down buttons also allow viewers to rank the value, quality, credibility and relevance of a video, something that is extremely important in an era when most of us are time-poor and scams abound.

Yesterday YouTube posted this video to its own "YouTUbe Creators" channel:

In the video they announced that the number of times a video has received a thumbs-down will be removed from video pages.

Viewers will still be able to give a video a thumbs-down but nobody aside from the creator of the video will be able to see how many times that button has been clicked. Only the thumbs-up total will be displayed.

In a very patronising way, YouTube explains that this change is being made to protect creators, some of who get very upset that people don't like their videos. They also say that there have been concerted attacks on videos by groups that have rallied and given videos huge numbers of thumbs-down ratings, again upsetting the poor delicate little snowflakes who have uploaded those vids.

Well that's what YouTube are *claiming* -- however, the reality is actually quite different and the deceit of their claims can be dismantled with only a small amount of critical thinking.

For a start, they protect the creator from nothing -- because the total number of thumbs-down clicks will still be visible to them, it's just the rest of the world that won't know.

Secondly, if a creator does not want to be upset by seeing thumbs-down clicks on their videos then they already have the ability to disable the ranking system (and the comments if they choose to).

The reality is that YouTube has likely had a lot of complaints from mainstream content creators who've discovered that when they've repurposed their content for YouTube, it has not gone down at all well. There are plenty of videos on the site which have received massive numbers of negative clicks and those mainstream media organisations are not happy to see their material being criticised in this way.

In fact, even YouTube's own "rewind" videos have recently scored massive numbers of downvotes (almost 20 million of them on this one) which must be a huge embarrassment to them. Perhaps THEY are amongst the snowflakes that can't handle criticism -- although they deny that this has anything to do with their latest decision (Cue Tui's ad).

YouTube says that it's made this decision to remove the thumbs-down totals after consulting with creators -- yet I wasn't consulted and neither were any of the great many other creators I've spoken with on the subject.

I'm afraid it's just more lies and deceit from YouTube who are trying to paste over the cracks in their crappy policies designed to appease big media.

To see just how badly they've misjudged the community's response to this change, take a look at the incredible 34,000 comments on that announcement video. They are almost without exception highly critical and scathing of the move.

Of course this won't change YouTube's mind because although they claim to listen to their community, the only thing that catches their ears these days is the sound of money.

Oh how the mighty have fallen.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column

Rank This Aardvark Page


Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines



The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam


Recent Columns

What sort of Covid Christmas will it be?
Exactly a week ago, well ahead of the mainstream media, I suggested in this column...

Fertile times for conspiracy theorists
Welcome to the future...

What? A free lunch?
Ultrafast fibre users whose service is provided by Spark, Vodafone or Orcon are in for a treat...

Come fly with me
I'm always looking for ways to solve problems...

Evil Santa
On the weekend I got roped into playing Santa for the local Lions Club...

Could Omicron be the end?
If you read the headline for today's column and went no further you could be forgiven for thinking I was a doomsayer...

Do your job, get an award?
As someone who has been self-employed for pretty much their whole life...

They did what?
Oh no, I've been at it again! ...

Fight fire with fire
It looks as if things are getting worse in respect to the CV19 situation in Europe right now...

Electric aviation?
I just watched a video published by Rolls Royce...

Buy a piece of history
Regular readers will be well aware that I predicted the failure of the Martin Jetpack right from the get-go...