Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Another botched IT project

6 March 2025

Hands up anyone who remembers the infamous INCIS project?

Yes, INCIS was a disaster of an IT project where almost anything that could go wrong, did go wrong.

Millions of dollars were spent and all we had to show for it was a mess of buggy, near-useless code that didn't come close to delivering on the promises made for it. Eventually it was just abandoned and left for dead, only a few fragments of it being scavenged for future use.

Anything organised by a bureaucracy as large as a significant government department or agency is bound to have issues but when you throw a large software project into the mix, there is huge potential for disaster.

Well guess what?

The ACC, one of our worst government-owned bureaucracies, has reinvented the spirit of INCIS, or so it would seem.

According to This RNZ report the ACC ProviderHub project has gone so badly off the rails that they've had to call in help from around the world to try and salvage it.

You could tell this project was doomed from the start -- given that they didn't even do a needs analysis or a business case to justify its existence. WTF?

Sounds to me as if a bunch of people thought "we have a snot load of excess money around here and playing with computers is fun so let's create a system we don't need and probably won't even work". I'm not kidding... that sort of mentality does exist within bureaucracies that are funded by way of taxes or levies -- after all, they have to do *something* with all that cash.

Here's a tip for ACC... how about not trying to dodge every claim that is made?

Do I have an axe to grind against ACC?

Well yes, but I'm far from alone.

When my wife suffered a treatment injury that left her with lasting brain damage her claim was denied. They said we didn't qualify because the gynecologist they sent her too couldn't see anything wrong with her.

It was only after more than a year of us forking out a fortune for *real* neurologists, MRIs and the like that they accepted her claim but but that meant the crucial first six months after such an injury had passed so it was more of a "oh well, too bad, nothing we can do now" response.

Since then I've seen a myriad of reports in the media of others who have suffered similar fates, being denied legitimate claims and being left to pick up the pieces themselves. Likewise I've met many of these people and heard first-hand their tales of denial by ACC.

Yet, it would seem... they have plenty of money to waste on follies such as ProviderHub, a project it seems that nobody asked for, nobody needs and (at least in its current state) nobody wants.

These are the dangers associated with any service that is funded from taxes or levies -- there's little responsibility because the assumption is made that our pockets are bottomless and shortfalls can be met with "just a small increase" in those levies or taxes.

Sounds a little like local body rates doesn't it?

However, I digress...

How best to solve the problems facing this project that has jumped the rails?

I'm wondering if AI might not be a much cheaper and ultimately more effective solution than bringing in very expensive rescue-programmers from around the globe.

Now that AI has the ability to rapidly analyse and understand existing chunks of code then document, debug and modify that code then surely we could harness that power to our advantage.

In fact, doesn't AI offer a huge potential to avoid giant stuff-ups like INCIS and ProviderHub in future?

Ask any programmer which job they like the least and they'll tell you that it's maintaining old, poorly documented legacy code. It can be incredibly difficult and there's little satisfaction in hunting down other people's bugs or trying to introduce new functionality without breaking a teetering tower of dependencies that are not documented anywhere.

Surely this is the perfect job for AI?

As the last COBOL programmer bites the dust, maybe even those really old bits of code running on a System 370 somewhere will last just a few years longer thanks to some AI system :-)

Carpe Diem folks!

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Here is a PERMANENT link to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

The ravages of old age kicking in
I'm getting on... 73 next month! ...

I'm having so much fun
While the rest of the world gripes and moans about the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and GPUs, I've been...

Solid state battery a scam?
Imagine a battery that stores 400 watt-hours per Kg, can be fully recharged in just five minutes and...

Time to dismantle representative democracy?
No, don't worry, I haven't gone wildly left-wing or embraced the charms of dictatorial communism...

Reviving old skills
There is no doubt about it, computer prices are about to go through the roof...

More on the ManageMyHealth hack
Earlier this week I wrote about a couple of hacking incidents here in New Zealand which seem to have exposed the personal information of hundreds of thousands of Kiwis...

The end of the PC era?
The era of the personal computer may be coming to an end...

Vigilante justice, is it okay?
We are told that without laws, rules and regulations the world would dissolve into a state of anarchy...

Welcome to the lunacy that is 2026
Here we go, another year, new challenges, new opportunities...

What the hell is going on?
This will be my last column for 2025, unless something really interesting or dramatic happens between now and the 5th of January 2026...