Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Adobe: All your content belongs to us

7 Jun 2024

Adobe is a software publisher with a number of top-tier titles in its catalog.

Adobe Acrobat has become a mainstay of the document publishing market, allowing for sophisticated formating and version control with support across a wide range of platforms.

Photoshop and Premiere have become industry-standard image and video editing applications and are used by countless millions of people every day.

When Adobe moved to a subscription model for many of its applications there was barely a murmor from customers. This was sold as a "feature" rather than an ongoing cost. For a simple monthly or annual fee you'd have access to the software without having to worry about paying for upgrades or new versions when they became available.

A change announced this week however, has the creative industry and business users foaming at the mouth in anger.

It seems that Adobe has decided that if you use any of its programs then they have the right to use the content you create for their own purposes.

This even goes as far as effectively allowing them to duplicate your material, derive new works from it and license it to others - without payment or notification to you.

In effect: any and all content that touches an Adobe product now belongs to Adobe.

To quote the company's own terms of service:

4.2 Licenses to Your Content. Solely for the purposes of operating or improving the Services and Software, you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free sublicensable, license, to use, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, create derivative works based on, publicly perform, and translate the Content. For example, we may sublicense our right to the Content to our service providers or to other users to allow the Services and Software to operate as intended, such as enabling you to share photos with others"

This went down like a lead balloon.

On X (formerly Twitter), a huge number of outraged Adobe users left comments expressing their anger and concern. For example:

Hey @Photoshop what the hell was that new agreement you forced us to sign this morning that locked our ap until we agree to it? We are working on a bloody movie here and NO, you don't suddenly have the right to any of the work we're doing on it because we pay yoyu to use photoshop. WTF?!

That tweet was later deleted -- apparently there is a way to opt-out but it's not trivial to do so and odds are that a lot of users will just click "accept" without even taking the time to read what they're agreeing to.

I suspect that like many companies riding the AI wave right now, Adobe is simply attempting to get users to agree to its use of their content for training its AI models. This clause effectively gives them access to a huge database of text, video and image data that represents an enormous value to any company seeking to train their AI systems.

The problem I see is that this is a one-way exchange of value. Adobe gets all that value but those whose material is being used as training data get nothing in return. Such unbalanced value-exchanges tend to be problematic and I would not be surprised to see an uptick in companies that finally kick Adobe's products to the curb in favour of alternatives such as Davinci Resolve from Blackmagic Designs.

Another potential problem for users is "leakage" -- the situation where sensitive or proprietary information is used as training material and the AI later discloses that information in a way that can be highly damaging to the parties from who the content was scraped.

I shall be monitoring the fallout from this decision by Adobe carefully and will keep readers informed.

Carpe Diem folks!

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

PERMALINK to this column

Rank This Aardvark Page


Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines



The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam


Recent Columns

Parlez vous Python?
I've been cutting code for decades...

A career change for me?
When I was a kid, I was the quintessential geek...

Why I might change my mind about YouTube
Despite being a relatively successful content creator on the YouTube platform I've long been a critic of the company and many of its policies...

The history of Ms Susan Law, CEO of the SWDC
I recently made a submission on the South Waikato District Council's "Long Term Plan"...

Brute force is not the answer to CPU performance
Ever since the ubiqutous 8080 set the benchmark for 8-bit microprocessor chip design...

Forget fusion generators
It is interesting to note that China now outspends the USA in its investment into fusion reactor development...

Is digital ID too risky?
Around the world, governments are rolling out digital ID systems for their citizens...

Speed limiters coming to NZ soon?
I've already written columns on the strange paradox that sees us driving cars which are capable of more than twice the legal speed limit...

Arming the Karens
There is a real discussion going on in the drone community right now...

How far has the media fallen?
Sadly, I believe the mainstream media as reached a new low...