New Zealand's Leading Daily Net-News Online Publication |
Net-Industry NEWS! |
|
|
Publishing Internet News and Commentary since 1995
.
| ||
| ||
|
Dateline: 8 March 2000 Early Edition Read The Previous Edition A permanent link to this page can be found here
Editorial
The expulsion was accompanied by some rather blue language which invited to
the Irishman to go forth and multiply.
Unfortunately the owner of the hosting company was unwilling to comment on
the reasons why he ejected the Irishman -- it seems there's some kind of
"cone of silence" in place.
My sources also indicate that the same Irishman was seen knocking on the door
of several other large ISPs in Auckland at various times during the day. It
appears his reception was equally cold in those instances.
So what's going on?
Well, as I mentioned yesterday, the Net is changing the way news publishers
are working. Yesterday, Russell Brown published a story on the IDG site which
quoted liberally from emails that were previously "secret" but which had been
leaked to a public mailing list. These emails were rather eye-opening, and
certainly very embarrassing for those who wrote them -- an obvious reason why
the would have preferred they remained hidden.
However, just as with the case of the billionaire drug user whose name suppression
was effectively rendered impotent by the power of the Net, the same thing is
effectively limiting the ability for closed groups to pull down the shutters against
external scrutiny of their activities.
And that's the way it is with the Irishman and what would appear to be a plot
to bully ISPs into doing this "his way."
I refer of course to the significant changes taking place in the way Domainz
is going to handle the domain name registration process. In order to participate
in the development and testing of this new system, ISPs have had to sign a
non-disclosure agreement. This is a document which appears to be so far reaching
in its coverage and draconian in its penalties that the ISPs concerned can't
even admit that they've signed it -- otherwise they'd be in breach.
Not a one of those who signed have made any comments to the media -- on or off
the record -- probably for fear of invoking Domainz team of "crack lawyers"
who would then descend on them like hungry vultures -- as they have done in
the case of the defamation action against Alan Brown.
But... and here's the twist, the whole "cone of silence" is effectively leaking
like the Titanic -- thanks to the Net.
Despite the Irishman's protests, and the ISPs refusal to even consider making
any form of comment, key pieces of the puzzle are being published (either by
people out of legal-reach or who have chosen to remain anonymous) in various
places on the Net -- revealing what appears to be a very nasty situation, likely
to result in tears all round.
The Irishman is about to find out that he can't simply dictate to the industry
how things will be -- they won't stand for it.
I'm still collecting details and I'll update you all on the situation tomorrow
but suffice to say... this is a story that won't go away.
A footnote to today's column -- why is it that New Zealand, a tiny country
on the backside of the globe, feels it necessary to send THREE people to the
ICANN meetings in Cairo?
Peter Dengate Thrush, Jim Higgins and Sue Leader have all gone to these meetings
to represent ISOCNZ -- hell, what's going on here -- it sounds like a giant
business-class junket to me!
One thing we can be sure of is that Jim Higgins hasn't gone to represent the membership
of ISOCNZ -- he's made it very clear how he hold's members' opinions to be
worthless. So tell us Jim -- what is your justification for being included in
this junket?
As always, your comments are gladly received.
Free republication rights available
on request
|
|
Aardvark Daily is a publication of, and is copyright to, Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved
|