All around the world we see governments making lots of noise about going
online to improve the levels of service they offer their citizens and to
increase the strength of the democratic process.
The truth however, is somewhat different to the spin.
You don't have to look far under the surface to realise that almost without
exception, governments live in fear of the Net.
This fear is partly born partly from ignorance -- very few politicians really understand
what the Net really is and I suspect too many of them have gathered far too
much of their knowledge from movies and TV.
The reality is of course, that a significant amount of a government's power comes
from convincing the citizens of a country that they should hand over their
democratic right to have a say in how the country is run to an elected representative.
Our current political system relies on electorates giving an MP carte-blanc to
speak on their behalf -- with virtually no accountability or obligation to
truly consult or represent -- short of the regular elections which supposedly
allow voters to dismiss anyone who doesn't perform and replace them with another
equally inept candidate.
Of course, here in New Zealand, the reality is that our MPs are bound to toe
the party line except in conscience votes (which are few and far between). This
all too often makes a mockery of the term "elected representative" and leads
to many voters being totally disenfrachised.
But now the Internet has the power to significantly change our parliamentary
system -- and that scares the undies off most politicians who would find their
3-year "license to ignore the voters" rendered null and void.
Already there are a few political groups using the Net to push for such changes --
driven by new technologies.
The 4 Direct Democracy
the
4 The NZ Super Democratic Party
and my own suggestion in the form of
4
Recoverable Proxy
are all examples of how people are now using the Net to try and educate voters
to the fact that we don't have to use a system that is hundreds of years out
of date and well past its use-by date.
So what have the last two governments really doing about the Net?
Well, it appears that they have simply issued volumes of rhetoric describing
what they're "going to do" and thrown a tiny amount of pocket-change at
fostering an e-economy.
Even now far too many of them are reluctant
to use email as a way of communicating with voters and appear to have little
real understanding of even the basics.
And, of course, all Net users should be very much aware of the existance
and implication of
4 Echelon,
the typical response of frightened governments -- and has our government denied
any involvement with this system? I suspect they can't.
It appears to me that they see the Net as far more of a threat than an
opportunity.
Someone Turn Out The Lights
Last week an eagle-eyed reader pointed out
this page
on the government's website.
Perhaps the government has come to the realisation that
its attrocious policies in respect to taxation and the new economy
will produce only one inevitable result?
As always, your feedback is welcomed.