The Need For Speed Appears Lost On Government
25 October 2000 Edition|
Yesterday the government and a bunch of "compatible" businesspeople sat around
and chewed the fat on how to address the burning issue of pulling this nation's
backside out of the fires of decline.
Nobody was expecting that when we awoke this morning the sun would be shining
extra bright and venture capital would flow like water -- but exactly what
has been achieved?
For anyone at the cutting edge of the "new economy" the single most important
issue would have to be that of research and development -- which is why many
of us were hoping that at least we'd see some concrete steps forward in this
Well Dr Cullen announced that he will be releasing a discussion paper and plans
to introduce new legislation next year that will become effective
on April 1, 2002.
April 2002? That's eighteen months away!
What are we supposed to do -- ask all our trading partners and competitors to
just stay where they are for a year and a half while we get around to taking
our first step to catch up?
As I've said repeatedly in this column, the
government, business, and indeed the entire country has to be prepared to
move at speed if we're to have the faintest hope of catching the new economy boat.
An eighteen month delay before NZ's R&D taxation regime is brought into line
with our trading partners is absolutely unacceptable and will likely drive even more
hi-tech ventures and investment into the welcoming arms of the USA, Ireland
and other new economies.
Don't be fooled by
on IDG's website in which implies that we'll be benefitting from the changes
to R&D tax by "early next year" -- that's just when the legislation would
be passed -- it won't come into effect until the following year (2002).
This must be extremely disappointing for those local and overseas investors
who are presently contemplating extensive investment in local new economy
Given that the government now acknowledges the loss of revenues associated with
honouring its pre-election R&D tax promise would be significantly less than
the $100m per year suggested by treasury I must ask why are they bothering
with a discussion paper and a 18-month delay? Business has made its needs
very clear and with a highly unified voice -- what's to discuss? Why delay?
It strikes me as absolutely unbelievable that the Prime Minister gave
$120m of unbudgeted money to the arts just months after the election yet chooses
to further ankle-tap attempts to get a new economy going in New Zealand by
deferring for 18 months what is perhaps the single most critical element of
government policy needed to foster a new economy here.
I know that when I run my own household budget I tend to consider "the arts"
to be a luxury item on which I'll spend money only once I've paid the insurances,
mortgage, power, phone and other essentials. It seems the Prime Minister is
perhaps not quite so prudent in her allocation of funds and we're all going to
pay the price as a result.
I have to admit that I'm left totally confused and somewhat disillusioned this
morning -- I was expecting a whole lot more.
The official line from this forum was that "we're talking" -- but, once again,
as I've said so often in this column -- talk is cheap but only actions produce
results and we have still yet to see any action at all from government.
Come on guys -- kill the rhetoric -- start doing something!
Sure, some areas will require careful consideration and debate before action
is taken but that doesn't mean quick, decisive moves can't be made on the
more clear-cut issues such as R&D taxation.
What do you think? Am I missing something here? Am I over-reacting? Should
the changes to R&D taxation, one of the Labour Party's election promises,
be implemented immediately or is 18 months a reasonable delay?
ClearNet Website Gets A Facelift -- Or Not?
When it was launched several years ago, the ClearNet website was something of
a breakthrough and most certainly set the benchmark for slick looking
web design in this country.
It's clean, bright, whiter-than-white colour scheme combined with just the right
level of graphics, a hint of Java and well-designed navigation brought oohs and
aahs of admiration from surfers and other web designers alike.
But the only thing constant on the Net is change -- and the old ClearNet site
is no more.
The cool, swish lines of the old site have gone, replaced by a layout that is
familiar but far from awe-inspiring.
While it's hard to fault the new site from a technical perspective (although
this snap shows there are
still some bugs), the flair and distinctive character that the old site had
is now gone. The new ClearNet site
isn't going to win any awards -- it's just too much like all the other would-be
portals -- the sizzle has gone.
share your opinion of the new ClearNet site?
If you want to receive the "all new" Aardvark Weekly in PDF format by email
then please use
the contact form to leave your email address.
You'll get a confirmation email within a day and you won't receive anything else
unless you respond to that email to confirm your opt-in status.
As always, email addresses submitted for the purposes of receiving the Weekly
will not be given away, sold, bent, spindled, mutilated or otherwise abused
and you will not receive anything other than the weekly as a result of signing
As always, your feedback is welcomed.