New Zealand's Leading Daily Net-News Online Publication |
Net-Industry NEWS! |
|
Publishing Internet News and Commentary since 1995
.
| ||
|
|
Dateline: 3 May 2000 Early Edition Read The Previous Edition A permanent link to this page can be found here
Editorial
This is a tactically brilliant move on the part of Clear, since Telecom's
position has never been weaker.
The success and popularity of the small
number of free ISPs that are drawing their revenues from the existing
interconnect deal obviously represent a not insignificant liability on
Telecom's books and the prospect of an eventual ruling by both the Commerce
Commission and a parliamentary inquiry (I should live so long) means that
there must be a lot of pressure to settle a deal quickly.
If the two big telcos could nut out a suitable deal, Telecom could avoid
funding these free ISPs and it could even usurp possible government intervention
by showing that it was playing fair with its competitors.
Now as consumers this all sounds great -- however, being an incurable cynic,
I can't help thinking of the banking and oil industries where we are supposed
to have lots of big companies all under keen competitive pressure to provide
customers with the best service at the best price. When I think of these
industries the word "cartel" pops up -- and I can't help but remembering
that Clear isn't some benevolent giant whose role in life is to free us all
from the vice-like monopoly grip of the evil giant Telecom.
No, Clear is JAT (Just Another Telco), and it is effectively owned by BT whose,
local call charging scheme in the UK makes Telecom's prices look
very tame by comparison.
So watch out, I wouldn't be surprised to see Theresa's handbag and Tim Cullinane's
briefcase rubbing handles beside the big oak table in the weeks to come and the
result may be some significant changes in the landscape of the local telco
scene -- perhaps to the advantage of customers -- perhaps not.
From the "Give Me A Break" Department
"E-government offers some fantastic opportunities. In the end we hope it
will give us a more transparent system where people can watch and
participate in democracy - that can only be good for New Zealand," Trevor
Mallard said.
"It is an important part of the future of democracy. We need a service
that’s at least as good at service and information delivery as the private
sector – if not better. "
I was almost moved to email Mr Mallard so I could congratulate him on this
bold initiative and to ask a couple of questions -- but then I remembered
the email I received from the office of Phil Goff just a few days ago:
The government appears to have a bit of a credibility problem here don't they? And if the government is being honest -- what better way to allow people to "watch and participate in democracy" than to introduce the Recoverable Proxy system? Or are their claims simply more political rhetoric? Now where did I put that brick wall -- my head is almost healed from the last session. Free republic-ation rights available on request :-)
General News & Current Events:
TODAY'S KEY NET-NEWS HEADLINES
Bring it on, says Clear chief
New SSC unit to set e-government standards
Two charged over transmission of spam e-mail messages
Warnings over Red Hat 'flaw'
An Alpha-Male Dot Com Battle
Complex solutions to simple problems?
Microsoft unveils new players for streaming, downloads
News Corp Takes Stake in Wireless Net Provider
Cos. Change Names To Match Domains
|
Aardvark Daily is a publication of, and is copyright to, Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved
|