New Zealand's Leading Daily Net-News Online Publication |
Net-Industry NEWS! |
|
|
Publishing Internet News and Commentary since 1995
.
| ||
| ||
|
Dateline: 16 May 2000 Early Edition Read The Previous Edition A permanent link to this page can be found here
Editorial
Despite the work of creative fiction released by Domainz PR spinmeister and
published in yesterday's edition of Aardvark,
it is clear that there are still some very real problems with the new registry.
For example -- the passwords of registrars were emailed to domain name
owners as described in
a story
on the IDG site this morning.
Then, in an even more astounding faux pas -- the password for accessing the
registration details for domainz.co.nz was also sent in an email to a totally
unrelated party.
Yes -- it would appear that, at least for a while, Domainz own registration
details were open to unauthorised alterations.
If Domainz can't even protect it's own passwords and information, how on earth can
name-holders feel confident that their information is safe from unauthorised
access or alteration?
And just in case Domainz think I'm making this up, the original password was
eight characters long, began with an "m", contained a three-digit number and
ended with a "t" didn't it! (naturally I'm not about to publish the password
itself -- because, based on the events of recent days, they might not have
changed it from that initial setting.)
It is clear that Domainz has not only a Microsoft delivery platform -- they're
also strong believers in Microsoft's security model: "Security? That's a user
problem!"
I've also received an almost endless stream of emails from people who have
encountered problems, data errors and other problems during the change-over.
Ultimately it seems that very little in the way of good project design,
management, implementation and commissioning discipline was applied to this
new registry and the change-over from the old. It has been my experience
that such a lack of planning and good discipline inevitably produces a system
which is little more than an ever-increasing "patchwork quilt" of fixes --
much like what we're seeing right now.
Telecom Don't Have A Clue
I was told that there was "already an offer on the table" -- a reference
to the full-page ads that filled newspapers a month or so ago in which Telecom
offered to waive the charges if you signed up to an 0867 ISP.
"So, now that ClearNet is going to be offering 0867 access, can we assume
that ClearNet customers will automatically get those amounts refunded?" I
asked.
The answer was a very non-committal "that's a policy issue we're still working
on."
Despite some more probing, Telecom would not come out and say that ClearNet
customers would automatically receive a refund. When I asked Clear, they
were also unsure and suggested I ask Telecom.
The Telecom spindoctor said he'd ring me back with an answer later in the day --
needless to say I received no such call. Full marks to Clear's PR people though,
they always follow up on such commitments.
Mind you, even though I introduced myself as "Bruce Simpson from Aardvark"
when Telecom's PR receptionist answered the phone, and again introduced
myself as "Bruce Simpson" to the spindoctor they allocated me -- he seemed
more than a little pissed off that I hadn't told him I was Aardvark until,
at the end of our conversation, he asked "and where are you from?" Maybe
they have a different set of answers prepared for me -- I dunno.
So... if you're a ClearNet user, don't rely on the fact that ClearNet will
now be offering 0867 access as a guarantee that you'll be refunded the Internet
tax you've already been billed or paid. It would very much appear that
Telecom would still rather that you joined up with anyone but ClearNet
before you get your money back.
Free republic-ation rights available
on request :-)
|
|
Aardvark Daily is a publication of, and is copyright to, Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved
|