New Zealand's Leading Daily Net-News Online Publication |
Net-Industry NEWS! |
|
|
Publishing Internet News and Commentary since 1995
.
| ||
| ||
|
Dateline: 17 May 2000 Early Edition Read The Previous Edition A permanent link to this page can be found here
Editorial
According to Telecom's submission to the Ministerial Inquiry into telecommunications,
(as reported by IDG),
Telecom wants ISPs to pay the cost of carrying Internet traffic on its network
-- and obviously that cost would have to be passed on to the users in some way.
Indeed, if Telecom's submission was accepted by the inquiry as reasonable, it could,
depending on the level of the charge and how it was levied, not only
spell the end of "free" Internet but also of flat-rate access.
What's worse, the company that just reported a $205 million profit during the last quarter
suggests that the government should subsidise the cost of delivering voice
and Net access to rural subscribers.
My goodness... I don't see the food industry asking the government to subsidise
its loss-leader specials at Foodtown -- why does Telecom feel it's entitled to
special privileges?
Now while I'm sure that Telecom can prove that the rental revenue from
residential rural connections represents a loss -- I wonder what the situation
is once you factor in all those "added value" services such as call-minder,
call diversion, city-caller and the like? I suspect this might tell a different
story.
If Telecom wants to be able to separate out its loss-making activities and
ask for government assistance, then how about it offers to have each of its
profit-making activities fall under government scrutiny and subjected to
a progressively calculated tax rate also?
But back to residential Net calls -- in effect, Telecom's submission simply
transfers the burden of the Internet Tax from the residential user to the ISP
-- who will then have to recover it through increased charges. However, if
you're Telecom -- your own ISP (XTRA) has an immediate advantage because you
can provide service without the interconnect fee for residential users being
anything other than a 'book entry."
Perhaps this also explains the sudden cosiness between Clear (a Telco) and
Telecom (a Telco) in respect to all things Internet?
Perhaps the most worrying thing about this whole issue is that there's a very
real chance that this government will simply accept Telecom's recommendations --
just like the last one accepted Telecom's lawyer's opinions over that of their
own Crown Law office. And don't think I'm joking -- after all, they did promise
to have the 0867 situation sorted out by February -- remember? And they also
(while in opposition) strongly criticised National's lack of action over
fostering a knowledge based economy -- but quickly decided that the right thing
to do once in power was to play the endless rhetoric game like their predecessors.
Oh yes... I'm still waiting for the Telecom spinmeister to make that call
he promised -- but I'm not holding my breath.
Free republic-ation rights available
on request :-)
|
|
Aardvark Daily is a publication of, and is copyright to, Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved
|