Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact|
When I was young (and dinosaurs walked the earth), one of my favourite pastimes
was listening to short-wave radio late at night.
Using an old valve radio and a massive aerial that was rigged between my bedroom
window and a huge oak tree, I could drag in scratchy, garbled signals from right
around the world.
The Voice of America and the BBC world service were just two of the many foreign
radio broadcasts that could be received. If you chose the right frequency you
could even hear amateur radio enthusiasts chatting away -- often in a foreign
Of course these days we can receive TV broadcasts from the BBC, CNN and a raft
of other channels direct from the UK or USA by satellite, with a crystal clear
sound *and* picture.
However, if radio's still your preference, there's always the Internet.
Or should I say -- there used to be the Internet.
While streaming video remains little more than a curiosity, thanks to the
enormous bandwidth it requires, streaming audio has become a very practical
Just as I used to spend hours listening to short-wave radio, I've found myself
increasingly tuning in to overseas radio stations by way of their streaming
feeds on the Net.
It can be very entertaining to listen to a talkback station in Texas and
realise that their moans and groans are almost identical to the moans
and groans of Kiwis -- despite the 10,000 mile distance between them.
However, the very viability of many streaming audio radio feeds is now in
question -- and it's all to do, some say, with greed.
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has successfully won
a bid to charge streaming audio broadcasters up to 70 cents per track played
per thousand listeners for the use of copyrighted music.
Now the broadcasters are bitching that this makes their already unprofitable
transmissions even less viable -- to the point where a significant percentage
have said that they'll be shutting down.
Is the RIAA simply being too greedy?
After all, while streaming audio is a whole lot better than the old shortwave
radio broadcasts of half a century ago, a 16Kbps feed is hardly "CD quality."
Response by listeners to the announcement has been swift and very critical,
with much talk of people ramping up their MP3 file-swapping activities
However, despite my own fascination with this medium, I don't think my reaction
is quite as radical. Sure, I think it will be a great shame if the RIAA
effectively forces many broadcasters to pull their streaming feed, but then
again I don't listen to Internet radio for the music.
Although my streaming radio tastes are eclectic, they seldom include "top 10"
radio stations. I'd rather ignore Britney Spears in good quality FM Stereo
from a local radio broadcast than have her already grossly mangled vocal
tones further mutilated by a bandwidth-limited audio stream.
However, for those still keen on listening to music over the Net, this move
by the RIAA might just represent a great opportunity for all those independent
musicians out there who are looking for an audience. If the online broadcasters
get behind these independent labels and artists then they might also find that
they finally start generating revenues.
Think about it -- if they play music you don't hear on the mainstream commercial
radio stations and listeners like it, they can also act as an online retailer
for MP3 versions of that music and actually earn some money for themselves
and the musicians concerned.
It strikes me that the RIAA must be doing a
Jake The Peg and has just shot
itself in its third foot.
What Do You Think?
As you'll have spotted, the sponsor's presence has appeared and several people
have already sent comments suggesting that it's a good compromise between
giving them value while keeping the site relatively graphics-lite. What
do you think?
And have you been checking out their products/services? Remember, but for
their kind support there'd be no Aardvark.
Have Your Say
As always, your comments are welcomed. Please remember to select
"For Publication" if you want them included on this site.
Have your say.
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it