Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Governments all around the world are working hard to ensure that broadband
Internet access is readily available to businesses, schools and the
general public.
In South Korea for instance, broadband flows like water and there has been
a huge uptake. The downside of this is that many of Korea's computers are
being used (often unwittingly) to send or relay spam in huge volumes.
Closer to home, our own government has committed to ensuring that as many
Kiwis as possible have access to some kind of broadband service.
Check Out The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Updated 29-Oct-2002
In fact, in at least one way we've been a world leader in the evolution
of broadband. I refer of course to the issue of charging by volume and
the use of data caps to limit a user's usage.
It seems that over in the USA, AT&T and Comcast are about to introduce
download caps on their broadband services.
Now, given the cost of providing service in areas of lower population density
and the relatively high cost of broadband, one really has to ask "do we
really need it?"
The vision portrayed by broadband providers is one where webpages load in the
blink of an eye, streaming video looks more like regular TV than a grainy,
jerky, animated postage stamp, and it becomes practical to download even the
largest files in just a few brief minutes.
However, despite all these apparent benefits, the uptake of broadband Internet,
even in countries where it's relatively cheap and readily available, seems
disappointingly low.
So does broadband really deliver on its promises?
Well yes, some webpages will load in the blink of an eye -- but others won't,
simply because they're delivered by slow servers or have insufficiently
bandwidth on their own Net connection.
Streaming video is sometimes a lot better than the stuff you see on dial-up -- but
there's really not a whole lot of broadband streaming video worth watching.
In fact, an increasing number of websites are classifying this type of stuff
as "premium content" and only making it available to those who are prepared
to pay a subscription.
Need to download large files? Well broadband will save you a lot of time when
compared to a dial-up connection -- but then the data-cap and per-MB charges
start to kick in. The experience can be a lot like going to a good party --
it's a whole lot of fun at the time but you can regret it later (when the bill arrives).
Ah.. but what about the "always online" aspect of DSL? No need to dial-up
and log-in when you want to surf the web, check your email or transfer files.
That's got to be good -- right?
Well if you're a Telecom DSL user then it's a double-edged blade. Being always
online means you could end up with a whopping great bill if some nefarious sod
decides to send you IP packets you didn't ask for. That data cap and per-MB charge
means that, unknown to you, your broadband connection could be secretly
bankrupting you. It also means that your firewall better be pretty damned good
since the hackers can spend 24/7 trying to break in.
So let's face it -- to the average Net user, a broadband connection
doesn't really offer a whole lot for the extra money does it?
It might save you from having to install a second line and it might have a great
"wow" factor -- but why would the "average" user pay two or three times
as much just so that Aardvark loads in 3 seconds instead of 15?
Well don't tell anyone -- but I suspect the main reason (outside of business/education)
that people want broadband is for things like P2P file-sharing and (gasp) porn!
Yes, as we all know, there's a very active community of people who use their
PCs to exchange music, recorded TV programmes/movies, and porn.
I strongly suspect that a huge percentage of "consumer" DSL traffic consists
of one or more of these commodities.
Which leaves me wondering how long before the recording and movie industries
start putting pressure on the broadband providers or (shudder) even start
demanding a copyright levy in much the same way that some countries impose
a recording artists' tax on blank media.
Oh no, I hope I haven't put another stupid idea into the music industry's
already confused mind.
[NO CARRIER]
Contacting Aardvark
As always, readers are invited to submit their comments on material covered
in this column. If you'd like your comments published here then please
be sure to use this form and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|