Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
It's time for some more crystal-ball gazing.
What do you think this year's "hot" technology or killer application will be?
In recent years we've seen P2P networking come out of nowhere to become
a major force in "informal" data sharing and we've seen WiFi technology
change the way we think of local area networks.
Of course there have also been some real duds. Does anyone know what
happened to Bluetooth -- the wireless technology that was going to
revolutionise the way our computers and cellphones talk to other
devices and peripherals?
Check Out The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Updated 2-Dec-2002
And how about those flexible colour displays eh? They've been "just a few
years away" for almost two decades now.
While reading an old (1960's) issue of Popular Science the other day I also noticed
that hydrogen-powered fuel cells are "just around the corner" and should start
appearing in vehicles some time in the 1970's.
Technology's a funny old thing isn't it?
All too often it's the things that look simple and most useful that are
the most difficult.
Where's my Dick Tracy video-phone/watch eh??
Where's my flying car?
But to return from the world of fantasy for just a moment, what will be the
hot technologies of 2003?
Well I expect that WiFi will continue to be important as it makes further
inroads into LAN and wider area networks.
I expect the greatest area of interest however, will be that of digital
PVRs such as the Tivo and the PC-based unit that is the Aardvark PC-based
Tivo-like box.
Having spent an inordinate amount of time investigating, evaluating and
actually using the various options I can honestly say that the tape-based
VCR will soon be dead.
I will be publishing a "wrap-up" feature on this project sometime in the next
week or so. This will include details of the final configuration which is
what I consider to be a fair compromise between functionality, price and
performance.
Of course I fully expect that in the coming year we'll start to see a growing
number of digital VCRs/PVRs appearing on the shelves of our stores but
so far I've been less than impressed with the price/performance ratio of
these devices when compared to the "roll your own" version.
Then there's the spectre of digital rights management that I'm sure will soon
become a part of any commercial units. Neither the content producers nor
broadcasters want people recording and sharing large archives of digitally
recorded material and, as we've seen with the music industry, they'll go
to incredible lengths to try and stop this happening.
In the meantime, here (based on several months of actual use) are just a
few of the reasons that you'll fall in love with a PC-based PVR:
- No more scrambling to find a blank tape when you unexpectedly come across
an interesting programme that's just starting -- simply hit record. An 80GB
hard drive will store over 100 hours of material recorded at near-DVD quality.
- Skip the ads in the blink of an eye -- just hit one button to instantly
jump past all the ads and go directly to the start of the next programme segment.
- Edit out the ads and burn a whole 1-hour program to a single CDR or a
full-length movie to two CDRs, with a playback quality that far exceeds regular
VHS tape. Friends have asked "where did you get that DVD?" when watching
a broadcast recording edited and burnt this way.
- Save money and space -- at $0.50 per hour for the media, CDRs are a lot
cheaper that VHS tapes and a fraction as bulky.
Surprisingly however, one of the features that was really quite cool to
play with initially has turned out to be of little practical use (to me).
I refer of course to the ability to pause, rewind and fast-forward a "live"
broadcast. This is really just a novelty that's fun to show people but
has little real use.
All we need to really help the PVR a popular consumer application is an
easy-to-use system for starting and stopping recording using just a
programme's name rather than my setting start/stop times. This too
will come -- eventually.
Being able to tell your PVR to tape every episode of Shortland Street,
Star Trek or whatever simply by entering the programme name will be a whole
lot simpler than struggling with the clunky timer setup on most VCRs -- to
say nothing of the fact that most VCRs are limited to a maximum of 8 hours
recording on a single tape.
So I'm wagering that if you don't have a PVR or PVR-capable PC already,
you probably will have within 12 months.
This is the hot technology for 2003.
Contacting Aardvark
As always, readers are invited to submit their comments on material covered
in this column. If you'd like your comments published here then please
be sure to use this form and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|