Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
The Australian government have decided to pass legislation to
ban spam.
In the EU, similar anti-spam legislation has been passed and the UK is close to
finalising its own
new laws to stem the tide.
In the USA, many individual states have already implemented anti-spam laws
and now there's a move to implement a nation-wide
don't spam me list.
And here in NZ, our e-alert government is doing... err.. well it looks
like not very much actually.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
But today's column isn't about the fact that a problem that costs Kiwi
businesses many millions of dollars a year is effectively being dodged
by government.
No, today's column is about one of the reasons why we need to crush spam.
I refer of course to the effects that spam can have on really stupid people.
Have you ever noticed that the words "spam" and "scam" are very similar?
That's no coincidence folks -- as my mailbox revealed this week.
First-up, I got an email happily said:
CONGRATULATIONS! You are entitled to
a prize sum of US$2,500,000.00. Reference number for your prize is
KP6821873DL; ticket number A/03-4912.
Oh yes.. I am a winner! Whoopee!
The email went on to tell me that only
six winners emerged in the category and therefore both are to receive
payouts of US$2,500,000.00 from the total US$15,000,000.00
Now if I were a really stupid person, I might be tempted to respond to this
email, whereupon I'm certain there'd be a demand for some kind of fee to
cover the costs of remitting these lucky millions of dollars.
However, the dumbest person associated with this scam is the spammer who sent
it. I'm sure that even the slowest and most gullible recipient might have
just noticed the 200+ other email addresses that were included in the "to"
field of the header who would have received exactly the same message.
Duh!
But not all s(c/p)ammers are so stupid.
This week I also received an email telling me that I could be the heir to
a small fortune because someone who might be related to me had invested
a large sum before they died intestate.
The email professed to be from "Lochinvar Investigations" of London and
they claimed to be operating on behalf of the HSBC in their attempts to find
a home for this cash.
As if the whole premise wasn't dubious enough, I noticed that the sender was
using a free email address rather than one from their own domain name. This
is even more curious when your check out
this website which
appears to be that of a bonafide business.
So, in my usual sleuth-like way, I fired a copy of the suspected s(c/p)am off
to the contact address given on the website and asked if it was kosher
or whether someone was using their good name in vain.
No response.
So, either the Lochinvar Investigations website is simply another part
of the scam -- built to increase the would-be victim's confidence level,
or the company doesn't read its email, or care.
My belief that this email was a scam was confirmed when, just a day later,
I received another copy which was identical in every way
except for the sender's name and the use of a different free email address.
Here are copies of the messages.
Note that they even spelt the company name wrong in the body of the email!
I have no doubt that those who respond to such messages will be told that
fortune awaits them -- so long as they ante-up a small "processing fee"
or something similar.
Now there can be no doubt that right now there are dozens, perhaps hundreds,
or maybe even thousands of Kiwis who are sending off their credit card
details to cover the costs associated with claiming their winnings or
inheritance.
What's worse, the chances are that those who fall for these s(c/p)ams are
those who can least afford to be duped.
And this is why our government needs to haul its bum out of Bellamy's and
get working on some anti-spam legislation so that we can catch up to the
rest of the world. It might not solve the problem (only education can do that)
but at least it will be a start!
If any Aardvark readers want to share an opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Donate
Although the very kind folks at iHug continue to generously sponsor the
publication of Aardvark, the bills still exceed the income by a fairly
significant amount. It is with this in mind therefore that I'm once
again soliciting donations from anyone who feels they're getting some
value from this daily column and news index. I've gone the PayPal
way of accepting donations because the time involved in processing a bunch
of little credit-card billings sometimes exceeds the monetary value they
represent. Just click on the button to donate whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally donate twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|