Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
If you read nothing else today, make sure you read
this story from IDG's website today.
This story highlights some of the terms and conditions surrounding the unbundled
bitstream service (UBS) offered by Telecom as a method of dodging the local-loop
unbundling bullet -- and it's not pretty.
In fact -- some of it is just plain ridiculous and will do little to encourage
real competition in the broadband DSL marketplace.
Most stunningly, there's a significant punitive fee to be paid when a third-party
provider convinces an existing Telecom DSL user to switch to a UBS-based service
Yes, Telecom will charge a $150 penalty (nearly four times the retail monthly
price of a JetSurf 1GB plan) for such defections.
Hopefully most will be smart enough to cancel their JetStream connection
and then purchase the alternative supplier's UBS-delivered option rather than
simply "switching" and thereby triggering the penalty.
No chance of ditching Telecom's voice-service and switching to VOIP using
a UBS service either. The moment a customer relinquishes their Telecom
voice service Telecom will refuse to provide UBS connectivity.
I'm not familiar enough with the rates ISPs are paying for international
bandwidth or other services to properly judge whether the $25.50-$27.95
monthly UBS fee that Telecom plans to charge third-party providers -- but
this part doesn't seem too bad to me.
In the case of an ISP looking to offer an alternative to the $40/month JetSurf 1GB
plan, that leaves them up to $14 to cover all the regular ISP services plus
that gigabyte of traffic.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
Unfortunately however, Telecom will be providing UBS on an uncommitted bandwidth
basis and there are probably a few cynics who will suggest that UBS customers
will get a lower allocation than Telecom's retail users. Similar charges
were leveled when the ISP dialing prefix was introduced and many of Telecom's
competitors alleged that their customers connections were being dropped before
Xtra's.
Overall, if I were an ISP or other service provider, I don't think
I'd be too chuffed with what Telecom is proposing.
In a truly competitive marketplace (such as the toll market), Telecom works
hard to retain customers by offering agressive prices and high levels of service --
but in the DSL market it simply plonks on a penalty fee for switching suppliers.
That speaks volumes doesn't it?
It should be pointed out of course, that this is a "discussion paper" and the
final T&C may differ from those that are currently proposed.
I'd like to hear from any potential suppliers of service using the UBS and
get their opinions of what's being mooted (confidentiality preserved
of course).
Williamson Still Talking
I see that Maurice Williamson (National's IT inaction man) has just finished
saying a lot about very little.
According (once again) to an IDG report, Williamson thinks that government
departments should justify why they purchase products from overseas hardware
or software suppliers.
Well last time I checked, such decisions were usually made on the basis of
purchase cost, total cost of ownership, suitability for the task and ongoing
support availability. Any IT manager who buys without full regard for the
most prudent use of their budget commensurate with the most effective delivery
of a solution is an idiot and shouldn't be in the role.
Williamson sounds like he's all in favour of adding another bit of bureaucracy
to the role of IT management -- but it's also a waste of time because he goes
on to say that [his] government wouldn't be interfering with such decisions.
"Do you want cabinet and the government to decide what software the public
sector buys?" he is quoted as saying.
Williamson went on to cite the INCIS project as an example of bad decision-making.
Can someone remind me who the Minister for IT was during the INCIS debacle?
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|