Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Why Kyoto is stupid

5 July 2006

I'm kind of scratching my head at the moment after hearing that Kiwis will likely be paying through the nose to meet their obligations under the Kyoto protocol.

According to this story (One News), there's a good chance that our power bills will soar if the government's proposal to punitively tax thermal power stations were to go ahead.

Quite frankly I don't really get Kyoto. Why take money away from those countries who most need to invest in carbon-reducing technologies?

By effectively fining countries for their carbon emissions, surely we're just making it harder for those countries to switch to cleaner, greener alternatives?

Just as worrying is the idiocy that sees tiny little NZ paying a huge fine (measured in hundreds of millions of dollars) for its emissions, while much larger polluters such as the USA and Australia were smart enough not to bother signing up to this document of self-flagellation.

Is the payment of this huge burden (by way of higher power prices or whatever) supposed to make us feel better about ourselves?

Right now, the country is so messed up in respect to its energy generation and distribution infrastructure that the last thing we need is a bunch of bureaucratic politicians signing us up to an idiot scheme like Kyoto.

$300m (or so) would go an awfully long way towards improving our "green" electricity generation capabilities and beefing-up our shaky power grid -- so why are we going to simply hand it over to the administrators of the Kyoto agreement?

Utter lunacy -- isn't it?

OurRegion - Manawatu
Please visit the sponsor!

Web Designers of NZ Unite?

Does anyone remember WDNZ?

Well for those who don't, way back in 1996, an attempt was made to create a local "industry group" to represent web designers.

Leading the charge was Dave Blyth of WebDesign but although it created a fair amount of interest, the group never really took off in the way that was initially envisioned.

Now, some ten years later, a new attempt is being made -- in the form of WDANZ.

Will this one fly?

I don't know, but I have my doubts. One of the problems is that I really don't know that the web design community needs an industry body. Despite the benefits that will allegedly flow from such membership, I strongly suspect that most good web designers are already doing "very nicely thank you" and the rest are always going to be "also-rans", regardless of any affiliations or memberships.

If WDANZ were offering some kind of consumer guarantee (as many other industry groups do) then I might be more inclined to think that it will become a significant presence -- but they don't. In fact, if a member of the public wants advice about the work of a non-WDANZ designer or to complain about a WDANZ member, they have to fork out $ to ring on an 0900 number (according to this page. That's pretty consumer-unfriendly.

Another concern is that, according to the website, "Some of the key advisors [to WDANZ] are Dan Khan (NetProfess), Michael Brandon (SearchMasters), Harvey Kane (RagePank)".

If that's the case, how can other members be assured that there's not going to be a degree of cherry-picking going on when the good contracts come along?

Perhaps WDANZ should clarify the role of these "advisors" so as to clarify the potential for any conflicts of interest there.

Despite my few reservations, I wish WDANZ luck and hope it turns out to offer some positive contributions to the industry and its customers.

Do you think (ten years after the first attempt) that NZ's web designers need a group like this, or (bearing in mind that it is a limited liability company and not an incorporated society) is this just a cunning plan to make some money from industry members?

Have your say on this...

Oh, and don't forget today's sci/tech news headlines


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Oh the irony
YouTube has made a lot of noise about enforcing its community standards of late...

The end of live streaming?
The events of last Friday continue to have deep repercussions on the shape and form that the internet may take from this point forwards...

More internet restrictions
It really does look as if the internet is dying -- from the perspective of being an open, free and somewhat anonymous method of accessing and disseminating information...

The future looks bleak
Today's column was going to be about the tragedy of the Christchurch mosque attacks which happened on Friday of last week...

No longer plane simple
Just about every country in the developed world has now grounded the Boeing 737 Max 8 aircraft, after two crashes that have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people...

When the sun shines
We all know where clouds live... in the sky...

Actions speak louder than words
I've written a few columns about the (apparent) decline in geekiness and the sad way people seem to be uninterested in the technology that powers the world around us...

A black-box society?
A few days ago I made a video (as you do) about how there seems to be a lack of interest in "making stuff" these days...

Tightening the screws?
The UK is pulling out of the EU in a move that has been called "Brexit"...

Treating symptoms not causes
Governments like to treat symptoms rather than causes...

Money-grab delayed
If you read yesterday's column, you may be interested in what has happened subsequently...