Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
No prizes for guessing the subject matter of today's column.
I think everyone would have to concede that a properly regulated and
grown ITC industry is pivotal to New Zealand's future in the global
economy of the 21st Century.
With fuel prices soaring, and unlikely to ever return to the rates we've
come to accept as "normal" in the past, a geographically remote country
like New Zealand will be forced to rely increasingly on virtual exports
instead of those which cost a fortune to physically transport to markets
half a world a way.
We also have to wake up to the realisation that even internal communication
rates play an important part in setting efficiency levels and the costs
of doing business.
So what on earth was Paul Swain, the ITC minister for a supposedly
centre-left government, doing when he moved to protect Telecom's monopoly
over the local loop?
I'm scratching my head in an effort to come up with some logical explanation
for the decision he announced yesterday and so far I've narrowed it down to
one or more of the following:
Stupidity, naivety, ignorance or corruption.
I still haven't made up my mind which of the above is truly applicable.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
Of course the minister has come out with some grandiose sounding words, such
as "Telecom are now on notice" -- but I think we all know that this is
little more than political rhetoric.
Swain also claimed that the decision was really a difficult one and more
of a "line call" than anything. Excuse me, but if such a call is so
close, isn't it a politician's job to side with the best interests of the
public rather than those of a multi-billion dollar corporation with a goodly
chunk of overseas ownership?
We're also told that Telecom will no longer engage in the monopolistic
practices we've seen it use so often in the past.
Well if Swain believes that then it's only a matter of time before someone
sells him the Auckland harbour bridge in what he would doubltlessly describe
as "a really good deal".
In winning this decision, Telecom has shown once again that it has more clever
people in its PR department than you'll find in the entirety of government
and its "advisors".
Further proof of this claim can be found in
this nice piece
written by Peter Griffin over at the Herald.
What is Swain doing giving Telecom the benefit of the doubt while the cosy
"use Telecom as your toll carrier and we'll discount your broadband" scheme
demonstrates its willingness and ability to continue with the abuse of the
very monopoly that was endorsed yesterday?
Even if Telecom does wholesale its digital data services, that doesn't
remove the fact that it retains a monopoly. What happens when newer and
better technology than DSL appears on the scene?
Will Telecom race out and spend a fortune in capital expenditure so that Kiwis
can benefit from such advances?
Hell no -- it will continue to try and squeeze the last cent of profit out of
its existing infrastructure and, because it retains its monopoly, there's
nothing competitors can do about it.
Compare this situation to one where everyone had direct access to the copper and
you'd likely find that an unbundled environment would not only promote lower
prices but also the rapid introduction of new technology, as each player attempted
to gain or protect a competitive advantage.
No, I'm sorry Mr Swain, you have shown yourself to be unworthy of the portfolio
you hold.
But what are the alternatives? My God! Not Maurice Williamson please!
It would appear that when it comes to ITC, both the major parties will be
guided by by people who have little understanding of the issues and are seemingly
unable to distinguish spin from fact. How the hell are we, as a nation, going
to realise our full potential in the global economy with dullards like this
at the controls?
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|