Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 14th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2012 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Microsoft does battle with a botnet

26 February 2010

If Microsoft's plan works, you might see a pronounced reduction in the amount of spam that reaches your mailbox over the next few days.

What is Microsoft's plan?

Well it seems that the company is effectively admitting defeat when it comes to successfully fending off malware infections on machines running its Windows operating system and has decided to use the courts to lend a hand.

But it hasn't sued the botnet operators, it has simply obtained a court order that has seen almost 300 domain names plucked from cyberspace and thrown into the recycling bin.

Codenamed "Operation b49", the goal of this initiative was to disconnect the malware infected computers from the machines that were being used to control their evil activities.

Microsoft estimates that some 1.5 billion spam messages a day were emanating from the network of computers infected with the Waledac botnet malware.

Good for you Microsoft... or maybe not.

Although the hundreds of thousands of infected PCs are no longer spewing spam, they are still carrying the malware from which the botnet was built and, at this stage, there appears to be no intention of disinfecting them or even advising owners of the fact that their machines have been compromised.

So where to now?

Perhaps Microsoft will issue a software patch as part of its Windows Update system which will de-activate the malware on those machines -- maybe not.

But what about the rights of those whose domains have been de-activated by order of the courts?

Chances are that a good number of those domains were also victims of evil little sods who had hacked into their servers and installed botnet control software. Now those sites are suddenly "off the air", pretty much without warning.

Is that fair?

Hell yes it's fair.

If you operate a server on the internet then you have a responsibility to ensure that it does not pose a threat to other Net-users.

Just as unsafe vehicles can be ordered off our roads, for fear they'll create an smash in which innocent people may die, so it should be with unsafe computers hooked up to the Net.

If a company's server gets hacked and loaded up with malware then they deserve disconnection, until such time as the system is clean and suitably protected from re-infection.

It's just a shame that those who are working to de-activate these botnets are focusing on the symptoms rather than the causes.

It's about time more of these evil little sods were thrown in jail and it's also about time those idiots who are stupid enough to buy their fake Viagra or penis-enlargement creams from spammers were hit with some hefty sanctions.

Since much of the drugware being flogged by spam originates in India, how about someone goes to the Indian authorities and says "Oi, your backyard drug industry is a major contributor to the levels of spam on the Net. Shut it down or else".

Then there are the credit-card companies who seem happy to sit back and collect their commissions on all the crap being pedaled by spammers. How about they add a clause to their merchant contracts that says "revenue generated by products or services directly sold as a result of spam will be forfeit" or at least added a clause that forbids any merchant (or their agents) to spam -- under threat of loss of that merchant facility.

It strikes me that without the cooperation of key players such as the CC merchants and governments of those countries that are most deeply involved in the spamming or delivery of spammed products we're stuffed.

How about, instead of spending all this time, effort and money infringing people's rights by way of conjuring up a secret ACTA agreement, we try dealing with the issue of creating an international accord designed to crush spamming?

I think (from memory) that the losses to *all* industry from spamming far exceeds the losses that the recording and movie industries are suffering from copyright infringement.

Let's try to deal with the bigger problems before we focus on the comparatively small issues that affect just a couple of industries -- shall we?

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say on this...

PERMALINK to this column

Oh, and don't forget today's sci/tech news headlines


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Apart from the kind support of the sponsor, Aardvark Daily is largely a labour of love that involves many hours of hard work each month. If you appreciate the content you find here (or even if you don't) then please visit the sponsor and also feel free to gift me a donation using the button above.

Remember, this is purely a gift, you'll get nothing other than a warm fuzzy feeling in return.


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

The Missile Man The Missile Man book

Previous Columns

The One-man pay-TV model
I like to think that I have at least some kind of understanding of the net "vibe"...

The now very fragile Internet
We're told that the Internet grew out of DARPA's attempts to build a resilient network that could withstand multiple failures and keep on working...

Have we reached "peak Facebook"?
There is no denying that Facebook is big -- very big...

Loose lips sink trips
Sometimes, when I tell people about just how prevalent the surveillance society has become they dismiss me as simply being paranoid...

Beyond binary
Last week my wife bought another armful of lever-arch ring binders in which to file more of the endless stream of paperwork that surrounds here association with ACC, medical specialists and others involved in the fallout from her accident...

SkyNet just around the corner?
Hands up all those who remember the attempt to create "Sealand", an independent sovereign cybercountry which was to be physically located on a dis-used sea fort in the North Sea, some 10 miles off the coast of England...

Feds to take-down Xtra, imprison Reynolds?
On the face of it, the Kim Dotcom and MegaUpload case is pretty simple: the guy created a service which enabled others to break the law by unlawfully exchanging files which contained material which was protected by copyright...

Stormy (space) weather
According to the BBC: "Our planet is being bombarded by high-energy particles unleashed by the strongest solar storm since 2005"...

Life on Venus - pictures prove it?
I've had enough of stories about piracy, digital rights and the USA's attempts to exert its legal muscle in areas that ought to be outside its jurisdiction...

All online business beware
Last week, NZ police raided the home (the media keep saying "mansion") of Kim Dotcom and arrested several people on a number of charges, including copyright infringement plus aiding and abetting copyright infringement...