Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 19th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2014 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Make Google Earth pay you

12 June 2012

You can walk down any street in the country and see what Google's StreetView cars can see.

You can fly a light aircraft over any town in the country and see what Google Earth sees.

So why all the fuss about plans by both Google and Apple to use aircraft fitted with high resolution cameras to enhance and update their respective online offerings?

In fact, when I first read about the concerns being voiced by some, I thought "what's there problem?"

For as long as I can remember, governments and local councils have been performing "aerial mapping" of towns, cities and countryside, using aircraft fitted with special high-resolution cameras.

Anyone willing to spend a bit of time and some coin could, in many cases, just drop into the council offices and peruse these aerial photos or buy a copy of those they wanted to take away.

So how does Google and Apple offering the same service for free change anything?

And then I got to thinking...

On reflection, perhaps I can see the issues here.

Councils and local authorities want the right to peer into your back yard from the air so that they can spot unpermitted constructions, pools and other features that may interest them.

By law, they have a right to stick their nose into your yard and your business because, by law, you are supposed to get their permission to do almost everything -- despite the fact that this is your own property.

The same can't be said for the street-gang across town who are looking for some "easy pickings" on their next burglary raid.

How handy is it for them to browse the streets and towns of your city, looking for convenient pedestrian lanes, signs of affluence normally hidden from a street view, or even that nice new boat parked behind your garage and all ready to tow away on its trailer?

This time, the phrase "only those with something to hide have anything to fear" is very true -- and who doesn't want to hide their valuables from potentially criminal eyes?

But what can concerned individuals do?

Not much I suspect. Moves to ban Google and Apple's aerial mapping activities would have to come from a government level -- and that's rather unlikely.

But I wonder -- perhaps there is a way...

What if you fill your back yard with a "creative work" which is going to be clearly visible from the skies.

A nice painting on your driveway or the garage roof. A lovely tile mosaic around the BBQ -- or something equally as artistic.

Let the Google and Apple planes fly overhead. Let them take their images.

And, when those images appear online, sue them for copyright infringement.

Use of *your* intellectual property (which is automatically protected by copyright as soon as it's "published") without license or payment is an offense punishable by the courts. This would be particularly enforceable, since Google/Apple would clearly be profiting from the use of the "copies" they are illegally publishing.

If you want to go the whole hog - register your creative work and then you can claim not only actual damages but punitive ones.

Earn money from these spies in the sky -- if that's what you want to do.

At the very least, this action would cause Google and Apple to carefully fuzz-out any back yard that might appear to contain such creative works - as they do now with faces and car license plates. Using this strategy there's a good chance that you'll get your privacy or your money.

Or will you just accept that, in the second decade of the 21st century, privacy is a concept that really only exists in history books.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say on this...

PERMALINK to this column

Oh, and don't forget today's sci/tech news headlines


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Apart from the kind support of the sponsor, Aardvark Daily is largely a labour of love that involves many hours of hard work each month. If you appreciate the content you find here (or even if you don't) then please visit the sponsor and also feel free to gift me a donation using the button above.

Remember, this is purely a gift, you'll get nothing other than a warm fuzzy feeling in return.


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

The Missile Man The Missile Man book

Previous Columns

Leaching off open source
I read something rather stunning this morning...

Just when you thought...
Just when you thought things could get any crazier with respect to idiot bureaucrats; they do...

CAA, MFNZ's hired gunslinger
Once again I have been sorely disappointed by the performance of the bureaucracy in this country...

Man on Mars -- will I survive?
I was a young, space-mad kid when man first stepped foot on the moon back in the late 1960s...

Heartbleed - horror or hype?
It's all over the news-wires right now -- the SSL vulnerability that has the potential to expose passwords, credit-card details and a raft of other data to the eyes of evil crackers and villains...

Botnet boom around the corner
Microsoft spends quite a bit of money every year fighting spam...

OMG... life on Mars?
Never use a small word when a diminutive one will suffice...

Goodbye GoogleTV, hello Android TV?
I've used GoogleTV via a low-cost 808 Android box and it's a nice alternative to broadcast TV or DVDs...

Online companies up their encryption
Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and many of the other big names in the internet industry are assuring users that their data is safe, thanks to an increased use of encryption...

When the next big thing isn't
On a very regular basis, "the next big thing" arrives in the world of technology and cyberspace...