Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Of paywalls and parachutes

19 June 2012

Fairfax media has announced sweeping changes to its news media empire.

One of the most notable of these changes is the plan to erect paywalls around its Australian news websites -- a move that will either save them or kill them.

The problem with paywalls is that they only work if you have some unique high-value content. If you're talking "pretty average" content then a paywall will simply drive people to other "free" publications and with those fleeing eyeballs goes your advertising revenue.

So it's a big gamble for Fairfax -- will it pay off?

Interestingly enough, it seems that Fairfax are having a bob each way with their online news media strategy, by opting to leave their NZ stable un-paywalled -- at least for the time being.

If they're thinking that they can't afford to paywall Stuff.co.nz so long as the NZH continues to offer its news for free -- they'd be dead right.

Here in NZ the NBR has been about the only news publication that has survived paywalling but, as I said earlier in this column, that's because they have some exclusive content that (generally high-income) folk are willing to pay for. None of our other dailies fall into this category.

I wonder what will happen if/when Fairfax decide to have a quiet chat with APN and we see the two organisations collude to introduce simultaneous paywalling -- effectively ensuring that there is no significant "news alternative" in the marketplace?

Will the Commerce Commission stand by and allow the two "daily news" giants form a cosy paywall duopoly?

Would it be fair for the CC to try and stop these publishers from both changing their business-model simultaneously -- after all, surely they have a right to decide exactly how they distribute their content?

With a fairly significant number of Kiwis now getting a good percentage of their daily news from APN or Fairfax websites -- I think the paywall issue could become a major one -- and perhaps a major opportunity for a second-tier news-site like Scoop.co.nz to significantly extend its readership and popularity.

The big problem is, of course, that if paywalls seem to work, every man and his dog is going to try and switch to the same model. We'll seek paywalls popping up left, right and centre -- with the result that many previously viable enterprises may find they've locked a huge percentage of their audience out and that those paywall subscriptions don't come close to meeting costs.

Of course the big problem for those who decide to try but then discard the paywall option is that the people who have paid are going to be mighty pee'd off if you turn around and then decide to make your content free again. They'll be wanting a refund -- perhaps at the very time a publisher finds their cashflow and reserves at an all-time low.

Erecting a paywall is therefore, somewhat like jumping out of an aircraft and hoping you have a parachute -- without knowing, until you pull the rip-cord, whether the pack on your back is filled with tatty rags or a life-saving canopy of rip-stop nylon.

The silly thing about Fairfax's move is that they're effectively ignoring a massive potential that's staring them in the face. They are uniquely placed to squeeze a whole lot more money out of their online media than they realise. It seems that the guys driving the Fairfax juggernaut have a very blinkered view of the Net and its users.

What a shame for them -- but what a glorious opportunity for someone else.

Watch for a really smart company to come out of left-corner in the areas that Fairfax are currently struggling to understand. I think that in another 3-5 years time, we'll see the giant Fairfax and its properties crumble to dust -- while newer, smarter, faster-moving innovators will move in and take over.

Bookmark this page folks!

Today's questions:

  1. Would you pay to read Stuff.co.nz content if NZ Herald was still free?
  2. Would you pay to read Stuff.co.nz if the NZH also had a paywall?
  3. Or, would you simply find another source for "free" news and pay nothing?

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say on this...

PERMALINK to this column

Oh, and don't forget today's sci/tech news headlines


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

SpaceX IPO, what could possibly go wrong?
SpaceX is getting ready to go public with an earth-shattering IPO...

The dark side of AI
I've written columns in the past, examining the type of jobs now under very real threat from advances in AI technology...

I shall have my own AI
It's official, I am turning to the dark side...

Time for a little solar?
I've been contemplating buying a solar panel for a while...

A huge weakness within AI
We're told that AI has been trained on the whole sum of human knowledge...

The power of the tech community
One of the really great things about the internet is that it has enabled the creation of powerful networks of tech-savvy people...

Loose ends
It's the end of another week so I thought I'd just add some more information on a few recent columns...

So many vulnerabilities
It is starting to look as if the entire planet is sleep-walking into a period of extreme vulnerability...

DRM on free-to-air TV?
This has to be one of the silliest things I've ever heard of...

Rugby ball hits manned aircraft
It's been a while since I commented on drones but an event last week is something well worthy of a rant...