Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Who would be stupid enough to...

29 May 2013

It seems that those pesky (allegedly) Chinese hackers are up to their old tricks again.

News on the wires this week indicate that not only have they stolen the details of more than a dozen US military weapons and technologies but now they've also left the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation red-faced after reports that the blueprints for its new headquarters were apparently snatched.

How embarrassing!

But I have to ask -- who are the idiots that put such sensitive data on a publicly accessible network such as the internet in the first place?

It strikes me that those who have engaged in such folly ought to be cleaning toilets, rather than being entrusted with the security of such sensitive data.

Given the number of critical pieces of critical infrastructure that have also been the target of attacks apparently delivered via the internet you'd think it might be time for a new "secure" net for such purposes -- don't you?

While running *everything* through the internet sounds like a great idea, it's an awfully risky one. No matter how many passwords you throw in their way, hackers will always find a way past your roadblocks -- if they have physical access to that network (and who doesn't have Net access these days?).

Surely the best idea, given that *everything* needs some form of interconnectivity these days, is to run a totally separate "securenet" which is not physically linked to the public internet. By eliminating any link, all the vital infrastructure and top-secret stuff can be effectively isolated from hackers -- be they in China, Iran or elsewhere.

Given the huge value of stuff such as weapons plans, power company systems and the like, it must be a justifiable cost to create this separate network solely for "critical" systems.

However, I strongly doubt we'll see the buffoons who are (ir)responsible for the current fiascos waking up and smelling the coffee any time soon. I suspect they'll just change their passwords from "pass" to "pass1" and blame others for their own deficiencies.

In the meantime, the general rule of thumb remains: if it's connected to the Net then it is NOT secure.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say on this...

PERMALINK to this column

Oh, and don't forget today's sci/tech news headlines


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Get ready for this
I've already written about the push to introduce Digital ID in the UK and the furore that is causing...

Do you miss this?
For many decades, most homes had a fairly simple piece of tech that is now absent...

The Enemy Within?
China's EVs are changing the world...

AI impacts us all
You might be old-fashioned and decide that you will not be using AI...

Where has all the Aspirin gone?
When I was a kid the universal pain-killer was Aspiri...

What has gone wrong?
When I jumped online this morning (at about 1:30am) I was reminded that something is wrong...

This is serious, I am not kidding
Okay, I confess, I am now addicted...

The internet is a cesspool
All over the world, governments are rolling out measures to protect children from the dangers that are to be found on the internet...

Digital ID is coming
I recall many years ago that the NZ government tried to bring in a national ID card...

It's happening again
Earlier this year there were mass reports of unidentified drones being seen over the US states of New York and New Jersey...