Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

More NSA skulduggery

17 January 2014

Many security experts will tell you that the only way to guarantee the security of your computer is to unplug it and place it in a locked room with an armed guard outside.

Obviously this is somewhat impractical -- since to be of any use, your computer must be connected -- at least to a power source and these days, to the internet.

However, reports are circulating that some computers which were not, nor have ever been Net-connected have been the subject of surveillance by the NSA.

How did they do this?

Simple, they "bugged" them with wireless devices which transmitted crucial data over distances sufficient to allow the NSA to receive that data and store it for later analysis.

Well that's what the reports claim -- however, one can't help but wonder about the veracity of these allegations.

Apparently, the computers being monitored in this way had been covertly fitted with small additional circuits internally or via their USB connectors. Something as simple as a "modified" USB cable could easily play host to such a digital data-bug and once installed it would likely go completely unnoticed.

Gaining access to the computers in order to install such spyware would be a part of the process since hardware can't be remotely installed in the way that software can. However, I'm sure the NSA can call on the services of other government agencies well-versed in covert physical intrusions.

What makes me a little hesitant about accepting the veracity of these reports is the claimed range of up to 8 miles.

An eight-mile range would require a reasonable amount of RF power and a decent antenna system -- not easy to achieve when you're trying to keep everything hidden and secret. However, it's possible that this range was achieved with some form of repeater -- perhaps physically hidden in a roof cavity or something so maybe I ought not be too skeptical.

In the light of these revelations, I guess we will now have to revise that old cliché from "is it safe to talk?" to "is it safe to type?"

Another domino falls in the war against privacy!

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

(Sorry, forums are stuffed at present)

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Get ready for this
I've already written about the push to introduce Digital ID in the UK and the furore that is causing...

Do you miss this?
For many decades, most homes had a fairly simple piece of tech that is now absent...

The Enemy Within?
China's EVs are changing the world...

AI impacts us all
You might be old-fashioned and decide that you will not be using AI...

Where has all the Aspirin gone?
When I was a kid the universal pain-killer was Aspiri...

What has gone wrong?
When I jumped online this morning (at about 1:30am) I was reminded that something is wrong...

This is serious, I am not kidding
Okay, I confess, I am now addicted...

The internet is a cesspool
All over the world, governments are rolling out measures to protect children from the dangers that are to be found on the internet...

Digital ID is coming
I recall many years ago that the NZ government tried to bring in a national ID card...

It's happening again
Earlier this year there were mass reports of unidentified drones being seen over the US states of New York and New Jersey...