Yes, I know I've speculated that the end of freedom on the Net is nigh -- but
this Wired.com story
shows just how far down the path we already are.
the contents of Aardvark's "million-dollar ideas" notebook
are revealed for all to see!
Security Systems Standards and Certification Act
which will be introduced to the US Senate in a few weeks, seeks to force all
manufacturers to fit their computer equipment with "certified security technologies"
as defined or approved by US legislators.
If the proposed law is passed, offenders would risk fines of up to US$500,000
and/or up to five years in prison.
So what does this all mean?
In effect, it would require all computer manufacturers and operating systems
vendors to include hardware and firmware to support copy-protection and
digital-rights management systems that conform to a federally approved
specification -- and it would make it a crime to remove or defeat this protection.
Suddenly the government and recording industry would have more control over
your computer than you would.
Need Cutting-Edge Copy?|
As NZ's longest-running online commentator, I'm looking for
extra syndication opportunities for this daily publication -- or I'm happy
to write casual or regular material specifically to order for print or
Net-based publications. If you're
interested, drop me a line
What's worse -- it could spell the end of open-source software as we know it
How could Linux or FreeBSD survive when the open source license states that
the source code to all additions and improvements must be made freely available?
If the code which accesses and/or implements the "certified security technologies"
was disclosed then it could be easily circumvented -- and that would be a crime
under the proposed law.
Of course it must be remembered that, at this stage, this is simply a proposed
law, and there are no guarantees that it will be passed -- but contemplate
on the effects if it was!
Reflect on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and how it is being enforced.
Who would have believed it possible just a couple of years ago that the USA
would begin arresting foreign nationals for breaching a domestic law while
living in their own country of residence -- and who would have thought that
a law would be passed that allowed researchers to be threatened with law suits
for revealing the results of their work?
Likewise, don't fall into the trap of thinking "but this would only affect the USA" --
again, look at the way the DMCA is having a global impact far beyond the borders
of the USA itself.
Also, once the benchmark is set, you can guarantee that virtually every other
government in the world will be more than happy to jump aboard this movement --
for their own purely selfish reasons.
Given the scope and power of the DMCA, I would not dismiss this proposed
new law as simply being a flight of fantasy.
Remember the other justifications that will undoubtedly be put forward in
favour of this new law...
The "certified security technologies" will certainly include a unique identifier
that becomes a part of every Internet conversation -- think how much easier it will
be to crack down on and reduce the incidence of undesirable and illegal online
activities such as cracking, fraud, child-porn, etc, etc., when you can identify
the offender by their digital fingerprints!
Remember that when Intel and Microsoft tried to add unique identifiers to their
products the market forced them to do an about-face -- but if it's law then
there's nothing the market can do except comply or face prosecution.
If you're not already worried that governments are clamping down on the
biggest threat there is to the concentrated power-base of politicians then
you'd better start paying attention.
As I mooted several years ago -- the Internet and other advances in communications
technology could soon spell the end of the type of serial autocracy we currently
call a democratic political system.
There are already a number of alternative systems being proposed and based on
the ability of these systems to increase political accountability. Check
The NZ Super Democratic Party
and my own suggestion:
So can you see why governments all over the world are looking for ways to
limit the threat by monitoring and controlling the Net?
Can you see why we, as the citizens of a supposedly democratic system, must
stand up and have our say about what a small group of self-interested people
wish to do with our freedoms?
As always, your comments are welcomed.
Save The Aardvark Fund
Yes, I have had several donations to the Aardvark fund and I thank those
who put their money where their mouse is :-)
If guilt is gnawing away inside you then there's still time to donate.
Just drop by and
hand over your loot.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
Just add a
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
There is/are 0 Vacancies Last added 2 July In The Job Centre
There are 14 Domain Names for sale